2020 Presidential Race

#35,501
#35,501
Soros-Funded Group Vows to Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump

Soros-FT-640x480.png


An open borders lobbying group, funded partially by billionaire George Soros, is vowing to defeat President Trump by turning out to vote about six million young and disenfranchised Hispanic Americans.

United We Dream activists said during a press call this week that they are “powering up” their members to turn out millions of new Hispanic American voters to tank Trump’s reelection campaign.

The group has long advocated for an amnesty for all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens and, specifically, the nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Soros-Funded Group Vows Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump
 
#35,503
#35,503
Franklin Pierce said:
Soros-Funded Group Vows to Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump

Soros-FT-640x480.png


An open borders lobbying group, funded partially by billionaire George Soros, is vowing to defeat President Trump by turning out to vote about six million young and disenfranchised Hispanic Americans.

United We Dream activists said during a press call this week that they are “powering up” their members to turn out millions of new Hispanic American voters to tank Trump’s reelection campaign.

The group has long advocated for an amnesty for all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens and, specifically, the nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Soros-Funded Group Vows Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump
Click to expand...
Can this guy just go sleep with the gophers already? What's in his veins vampire blood ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and W.TN.Orange Blood
#35,505
#35,505
Franklin Pierce said:
Soros-Funded Group Vows to Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump

Soros-FT-640x480.png


An open borders lobbying group, funded partially by billionaire George Soros, is vowing to defeat President Trump by turning out to vote about six million young and disenfranchised Hispanic Americans.

United We Dream activists said during a press call this week that they are “powering up” their members to turn out millions of new Hispanic American voters to tank Trump’s reelection campaign.

The group has long advocated for an amnesty for all 11 to 22 million illegal aliens and, specifically, the nearly 800,000 illegal aliens enrolled in former President Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program.

Soros-Funded Group Vows Turn Out 6M Hispanic Voters to Defeat Trump
Click to expand...

You know Trump is doing something right when you have every Left-Wing nut job ready to go the illegal route to oust Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush, CagleMtnVol and Franklin Pierce
#35,506
#35,506
Democrats grimace at Fidel Castro comments by Biden VP contender Karen Bass

200627-karen-bass-castro.jpg


Some Democrats got a little queasy after they learned Florida Rep. Karen Bass is on Joe Biden’s list of possible running mates.

The Los Angeles Democrat raised eyebrows in 2016 after the death of Fidel Castro, when she referred to the Cuban autocrat as “Comandante en jefe” — an honorific that roughly translates to “commander in chief.”

Republicans often accuse Democrats of being socialists, and the line particularly rankled elected party grandees in Florida — many of whom have large Cuban-American constituencies.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/27/democrats-grimace-at-castro-comments-by-biden-vp-contender/
 
#35,507
#35,507
Barack Obama, top Democrats warn against ‘complacency’ in 2020 election

June 27, 2020

Top Democrats are warning the faithful not to get too comfortable about the party’s chances in the 2020 presidential election.

Though President Trump is mired in the COVID-19 pandemic, economic upheavals and racial unrest, that alone may not spell victory for former Vice President Joe Biden in November, they warn.

The party remains scarred by rosy 2016 poll numbers that showed Hillary Clinton cruising to victory in states like Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania — which ultimately went for Trump by razor-thin margins and helped swing the election. Just weeks before the vote, The New York Times declared Clinton had a 91% chance of becoming president.

https://nypost.com/2020/06/27/obama-top-democrats-warn-against-complacency-in-2020-election/
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#35,509
#35,509
volfanjustin said:
It’s funny no one had an answer yesterday, O’Biden has been in government for 50 years, what has he ever accomplished? What has he accomplished in government or the private sector?
Click to expand...
There is not a single person voting for Biden bc they feel he is a competent politician.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, volfanjustin, 0nelilreb and 1 other person
#35,511
#35,511
BowlBrother85 said:
I didn't say it began with Trump, and I didn't say it was one-sided. But it has become a political body and there is no going back now. Clearly, Trump does view his Supreme Court nominations to be extensions of his administration. Trump's tweet that the Supreme Court may not like him, was very telling. He doesn't consider their rulings to be legal interpretations of the law or of the Constitution. He considers them to be political decisions.
Click to expand...
We could go back, we should go back. But willingness to accept it, such as you display, is why we won't.
 
#35,513
#35,513
Weezer said:
We could go back, we should go back. But willingness to accept it, such as you display, is why we won't.
Click to expand...
Electing presidents like Donald Trump, is why we won't go back to the Supreme Court ever again being apolitical. Trump clearly views nominations for Supreme Court Justices as being political appointments, and he is disappointed (he even takes it personally), when the rulings of his nominees aren't in line with his own personal ideology. Look at what Trump said about Neil Gorsuch after his very reasonable DACA ruling. Trump viewed that as Gorsuch being disloyal to him. Unreal.
 
#35,514
#35,514
BowlBrother85 said:
Electing presidents like Donald Trump, is why we won't go back to the Supreme Court ever again being apolitical. Trump clearly views nominations for Supreme Court Justices as being political appointments, and he is disappointed (he even takes it personally), when the rulings of his nominees aren't in line with his own personal ideology.
Click to expand...
Really? Appointing RBG (ACLU) wasn't a political appointment? Or even Sotomayor and Kagan?

Come on, man. . . who you foolin'?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NEO, TN-POSSUM, Franklin Pierce and 4 others
#35,515
#35,515
BowlBrother85 said:
Electing presidents like Donald Trump, is why we won't go back to the Supreme Court ever again being apolitical. Trump clearly views nominations for Supreme Court Justices as being political appointments, and he is disappointed (he even takes it personally), when the rulings of his nominees aren't in line with his own personal ideology. Look at what Trump said about Neil Gorsuch after his very reasonable DACA ruling. Trump viewed that as Gorsuch being disloyal to him. Unreal.
Click to expand...
So none of our previous Presidents saw them as political appointments? Again, you act as if it began with Trump. That's disingenuous. It began long before Trump. You're pushing an anti-Trump narrative at the expense of truth. It's fine if you hate Trump, but don't get so caught up you blind yourself to reality. This goes so far beyond him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, StarRaider, VolnJC and 3 others
#35,516
#35,516
Weezer said:
So none of our previous Presidents saw them as political appointments? Again, you act as if it began with Trump. That's disingenuous. It began long before Trump. You're pushing an anti-Trump narrative at the expense of truth. It's fine if you hate Trump, but don't get so caught up you blind yourself to reality. This goes so far beyond him.
Click to expand...
No, I didn't act as if this began with Trump. He just hasn't done anything to improve the situation, and since he is the current President, he is the most relevant to the discussion. You like to put words in other people's mouths so you can conveniently portray their point-of-view as being strictly one of partisanship.
 
#35,517
#35,517
BowlBrother85 said:
No, I didn't act as if this began with Trump. You like to put words in other people's mouths so you can conveniently portray their point-of-view as being partisan.
Click to expand...

What words did I put in your mouth? Did you or did you not make it a Trump issue when it has been going on for so much longer? Your words speak for themselves, and the answer is you did. And yes, your post was full of partisanship. I don't have to portray it as anything. It was clear as day. Take off the blinders and reread what you wrote and maybe you'll see it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider and W.TN.Orange Blood
#35,518
#35,518
Weezer said:
So none of our previous Presidents saw them as political appointments? Again, you act as if it began with Trump. That's disingenuous. It began long before Trump. You're pushing an anti-Trump narrative at the expense of truth. It's fine if you hate Trump, but don't get so caught up you blind yourself to reality. This goes so far beyond him.
Click to expand...
No one is claiming Trump is the first. The claim (at least by me) is that Trump is the worst. That's an important distinction.
He ran as a no compromise, purely partisan divider. People voted for him because he was going to be the worst.
That's the sad part.
 
#35,519
#35,519
luthervol said:
No one is claiming Trump is the first. The claim (at least by me) is that Trump is the worst. That's an important distinction.
He ran as a no compromise, purely partisan divider. People voted for him because he was going to be the worst.
That's the sad part.
Click to expand...
When one of his own appointees rules against him, how does that make him the worst at political appointees to the SCOTUS?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StarRaider
#35,520
#35,520
Weezer said:
When one of his own appointees rules against him, how does that make him the worst at political appointees to the SCOTUS?
Click to expand...
The fact that Trump even views a ruling by a Supreme Court Justice this way, is a sign that he is part of the problem. In an ideal apolitical Supreme Court, the Justices make their rulings, not in favor of a politician or against a politician, but in accord with their interpretations of the law, precedents and the United States Constitution.
 
#35,521
#35,521
BowlBrother85 said:
The fact that Trump even views a ruling by a Supreme Court Justice this way, is a sign that he is part of the problem. In an ideal apolitical Supreme Court, the Justices make their rulings, not in favor of a politician or against a politician, but in accord with their interpretations of the law, precedents and the United States Constitution.
Click to expand...
Which is what I've been saying. But as we've both pointed out, when a President, any President, appoints a justice, it has become about politics, and said President expects loyalty. Trump's appointee actually did the RIGHT thing. Trump actually appointed a justice willing to overlook politics in favor of law. Mind blowing, isn't it? Is RBG willing to do that? Sotomayor? Kagan? We've seen two so-called conservative justices, both appointed by Republican Presidents, willing to put politics aside. Two of nine. What are the odds the other 7 make the same kind of show?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#35,523
#35,523
Weezer said:
Which is what I've been saying. But as we've both pointed out, when a President, any President, appoints a justice, it has become about politics, and said President expects loyalty. Trump's appointee actually did the RIGHT thing. Trump actually appointed a justice willing to overlook politics in favor of law. Mind blowing, isn't it? Is RBG willing to do that? Sotomayor? Kagan? We've seen two so-called conservative justices, both appointed by Republican Presidents, willing to put politics aside. Two of nine. What are the odds the other 7 make the same kind of show?
Click to expand...
Neil Gorsuch was a very reasonable choice. I said so at the time. He is center/right. I believe a centrist was chosen as a way to mend fences with Democrats over the way the Merrick Garland nomination was handled. I don't think he was Trump's choice. I think he was Mitch McConnell's.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top