Qanon -The Storm

#13,852
#13,852
Septic said:
Watching them fall for the chi-NA ballot conspiracy seed planting is going to be the coup de gras.

The term gullibility will be redifined by these rubes.
Click to expand...

It took some time (admittedly, wasted time), but I think I got this...

If you can solve the following, then you are half way there (to nowhere, actually).

What the cocoa leaf is to the igloo, this former President was to chocolate.

BUT WAIT!

And there there is this:

6 divided by 2(1+2) =

Stay safe.
 
#13,853
#13,853
Offset Eye said:
It took some time (admittedly, wasted time), but I think I got this...

If you can solve the following, then you are half way there (to nowhere, actually).

What the cocoa leaf is to the igloo, this former President was to chocolate.

BUT WAIT!

And there there is this:

6 divided by 2(1+2) =

Stay safe.
Click to expand...

Q PROOF:

The toothless rooster flies at noon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger, NashVol11 and tennvols77
#13,861
#13,861
4529
Governors Are Not Immune to Lawsuits Arising Out of Willful or Negligent Disregard of State Laws
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV626 Jun 2020 - 4:02:11 PM
📁
Did order(s) violate government mandated policies?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were reckless?
Would a jury of peers agree their actions were negligent?
Suits Against State Officials📁
"The immunity of a state from suit has long been held not to extend to actions against state officials for damages arising out of willful and negligent disregard of state laws.165 The reach of the rule is evident in Scheuer v. Rhodes,166 in which the Court held that plaintiffs were not barred by the Eleventh Amendment or other immunity doctrines from suing the governor and other officials of a state alleging that they deprived plaintiffs of federal rights under color of state law and seeking damages, when it was clear that plaintiffs were seeking to impose individual and personal liability on the officials. There was no “executive immunity” from suit, the Court held; rather, the immunity of state officials is qualified and varies according to the scope of discretion and responsibilities of the particular office and the circumstances existing at the time the challenged action was taken."
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#13,867
#13,867
4535
Link to New Q Drop
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV628 Jun 2020 - 3:56:10 PM
A person(s) value:
1. vote
2. monetary value (tax contribution)
3.
Why is 'free thought' ridiculed, challenged, and threatened when a person is opposed to the 'mainstream-narrative'?
[2] remains fixed (degree allowable by 'economic recession/expansion')
[1] remains a variable
[1] dependent on a 'controlled' system of information dissemination
What happens when 90% of the media is controlled/owned by (6) corporations?
What happens when those same corporations are operated and controlled by a political ideology?
What happens when the news is no longer free from bias?
What happens when the news is no longer reliable and independent?
What happens when the news is no longer trustworthy?
What happens when the news simply becomes an extension/arm of a political party?
Fact becomes fiction?
Fiction becomes fact?
When does news become propaganda?
Identity creation?
How does the average person, who is under constant financial stress (by design), find time to research and discern fact v fiction?
Majority of people more prone to believe someone in power sitting behind a big brand ‘news’ name?
Do people [human psyche] tend to follow the ‘majority/mainstream viewpoint’ in fear of being isolated and/or shunned?
‘Mainstream’ is used for a reason [dominate trend in opinion].
[If majority of people believe ‘x’ then ‘x’ must be validated / true]
Why do ‘mainstream’ media heads, within different orgs, always use the same keywords and/or catch phrases?
Coordinated? By who? Outside entity providing instructions?
Do they count on the fact that people [human psyche] are more prone to believe something if heard over-and-over again by different ‘trusted’ sources?
Do ‘echo chamber’ tactics provide validation / credibility to the topic/point being discussed?
Threat to intellectual freedom?
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
Read again – digest.
Would control over[of] these institutions/organizations allow for the mass control of a populations viewpoint re: a desired topic?
THINK BLM PUSH EVERY 4-YEARS.
Logical thinking.
Why, after the election of 2016, did [D]’s and media corps jumpstart a [coordinated & planned] divisive blitz intended to create falsehoods re: illegitimacy of election, character assassination of POTUS through sexism, racism, every other ‘ism’?
How much of the population still believes POTUS colluded w/ RUSSIA due to MSDNC 365-blitz?
No MSDNC retraction of POTUS_RUSSIA collusion narrative [propaganda]? _why?
Pre/post 2016 election?
Why were[are] violent [masked] terror orgs such as Antifa immediately created/funded and allowed to operate within [D] controlled cities [safe-zones]?
Why were these orgs tasked w/ immediate intimidation/shut down of any pro-POTUS rally[ s ] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized to counter and silence pro-POTUS rally[ s ] and/or events?
Why were marches immediately organized which divided people into sex/gender, race, [ism]?
When you control the levers of news dissemination, you control the narrative.
Control of the narrative = power
When you are blind, what do you see?
They want you divided.
Divided by religion.
Divided by race.
Divided by sex.
Divided by political affiliation.
Divided by class.
When you are divided, and angry, and controlled, you target those ‘different’ from you, not those responsible [controllers].
Divided you are weak.
Divided you pose no threat to their control.
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or stable [livestock kept – sheep].
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
THIS REPRESENTS A CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321, marcusluvsvols and TN-POSSUM
#13,868
#13,868
4536
Link to New Q Drop
Q!!Hs1Jq13jV628 Jun 2020 - 4:18:28 PM
📁
If the news is untrustworthy, corrupt, controlled, and simply an extension [arm] of the [D] party…
How do you circumvent? [controlled lines of comm [propaganda]]
How do you communicate directly with the people?
Backchannels are important.
Information warfare.
Knowledge is >power<
Q
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Vol1321
#13,872
#13,872
ajvol01 said:
Thanks for sharing.

Nearly 2-1/2 hours is quite long.

Is there a specific part you recommend watching?

I don’t usually watch videos this long unless there’s something of specific interest.
Click to expand...

I tell you this, if we dont start seeing people get arrested or any signs of the swamp draining, there are going to be a lot of politically dissatisfied people that have put their credibility on the line following these stories and the Q-Anon narrative. It would be one of the cruelest jokes ever played.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush and Purple Tiger
#13,873
#13,873
ajvol01 said:
Thanks for sharing.

Nearly 2-1/2 hours is quite long.

Is there a specific part you recommend watching?

I don’t usually watch videos this long unless there’s something of specific interest.
Click to expand...

He’s always a fabulous watch. Pretty much all his videos are worth the time spent. Language warning though for any sensitive types.🤣
 
  • Like
Reactions: malinoisvol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top