volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,654
- Likes
- 23,623
must shut down this barbershop because people will die if he cuts hair
AG: State suspends Owosso barber's license for refusing to shut down shop
So basically, you’re saying the antibody tests can’t be trusted because we aren’t testing everyone. Maybe that’s an oversimplification but that’s what I’m getting out of it. I understand your perspective but you asked a question so let me answer it. I’d say I don’t think there will be a second wave due to a little bit of both of your scenarios. I do think it has been here a while so more people have already had it than we know and of the ones that will get it a good chunk will be asymptomatic or have very minor symptoms. I believe we’ve seen the worst of it.Well, the post was intended to reply to your thoughts around whether there would be a massive second wave and that you think antibody tests suggest there won't be. A massive second wave implies fast spread. So are you not worried about a second wave because it's been here for a long time and won't spread or not worried because a lot of people will just be asymptomatic?
Regardless, my answer is that if from a public health perspective you don't want large outbreaks, then how fast it spreads matters (even if a large fraction of people are asymptomatic, though that makes the consequences of a massive wave less severe). The people who get it and do develop severe symptoms are getting it alongside the asymptomatic, and it's that wave that just passed through NY (along with a lot of folks that didn't know they had it) in order to get up to these 30% antibody levels. The shape of the death arrival curve implies the shape of the case arrival curve - and it rose quickly and fell off quite well after mitigation measures. But just knowing the 25-30% antibody levels doesn't tell you much about that progression...it's just an integral of cases/day to get total cases.
he was asked about a NY times article that basically accused UFC of not following social distancing measures, wearing mask etc. So when asked, he said F#$k that guy and he had every right to do so they never covered his sport until it was to push a narrative of fear. So I'm with Dana, f$%k that guyWhat was the question, there isn’t even any context... or are we just excited that he said “F that guy” and it happens to be about an outlet we dislike?
The liberal POS writer was criticizing him for having a competition, clearly you didn't watch it. He was right "F that guy" and I would add F everyone at the NYT and CNN and MSNBC and ABC and CBS and WaPo...I could keep going but you get the pointWhat was the question, there isn’t even any context... or are we just excited that he said “F that guy” and it happens to be about an outlet we dislike?
This is getting ugly
he was asked about a NY times article that basically accused UFC of not following social distancing measures, wearing mask etc. So when asked, he said F#$k that guy and he had every right to do so they never covered his sport until it was to push a narrative of fear. So I'm with Dana, f$%k that guy