Qanon -The Storm

#11,781
#11,781
Septic said:
"The FBI for the first time has identified fringe conspiracy theories as a domestic terrorist threat, according to a previously unpublicized document obtained by Yahoo News. (Read the document below.)

The FBI intelligence bulletin from the bureau’s Phoenix field office, dated May 30, 2019, describes “conspiracy theory-driven domestic extremists,” as a growing threat, and notes that it is the first such report to do so. It lists a number of arrests, including some that haven’t been publicized, related to violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs."

The document specifically mentions QAnon, a shadowy network that believes in a deep state conspiracy against President Trump, and Pizzagate, the theory that a pedophile ring including Clinton associates was being run out of the basement of a Washington, D.C., pizza restaurant (which didn’t actually have a basement).

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

rtfa
Click to expand...

"It lists a number of arrests, including some that haven’t been publicized, related to violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs."

...

"The document specifically mentions QAnon..."


Shut the front door!.

They list arrest "related to" "violent incidents" that were "motivated by" "fringe beliefs", and then "mention" QAnon...?

Yep. Chasing shadows and suggesting mal intent. One would think you'd be writing the FBI, telling them to "put up or shut up", eh?

Q claims that there's been a deep state coup that the FBI is implicated in. The FBI admitted to spying on a presidential campaign and defrauding the FISA court to do so. High ranking FBI agent/attorney are texting about their insurance policy against Trump.

But hey... They FBI said that there's been violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs. And then they specifically mentioned QAnon. I guess that settles that, Inspector Clouseau.

You're serving up weak sauce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#11,784
#11,784
Orange_Crush said:
"It lists a number of arrests, including some that haven’t been publicized, related to violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs."

...

"The document specifically mentions QAnon..."


Shut the front door!.

They list arrest "related to" "violent incidents" that were "motivated by" "fringe beliefs", and then "mention" QAnon...?

Yep. Chasing shadows and suggesting mal intent. One would think you'd be writing the FBI, telling them to "put up or shut up", eh?

Q claims that there's been a deep state coup that the FBI is implicated in. The FBI admitted to spying on a presidential campaign and defrauding the FISA court to do so. High ranking FBI agent/attorney are texting about their insurance policy against Trump.

But hey... They FBI said that there's been violent incidents motivated by fringe beliefs. And then they specifically mentioned QAnon. I guess that settles that, Inspector Clouseau.

You're serving up weak sauce.
Click to expand...

Let me make sure I understand this, your argument is that because the FBI survieled Carter Page and one of its thousands of agents doesn't like Trump - nothing that the Bureau does or says is from there on out is credible? This is the hill where you're planting your flag? Goodness...

It appears as if there is sufficient logical evidence for the FBIs classification of Qanon being a source of domestic terrorism as was noted by the article. The violence, murders and numerous arrests set a clear, convincing and rational stage for the DT label. Or are you simply going to refuse to acknowledge these crimes being directly tied to Qanon followers? Pretend they don't exist, plug your ears and scream about Peter Strzok?

These aren't shadows, people are hurting other people and admitting to being radicalized by these nutty theories. I get that it's inconvenient, but trying to poison the well of the FBI by pointing at a wholly unrelated transgression is what's weak.

Q's record sucks, Ms. Cleo threw less garbage against the wall and got more of it to stick - with none of the associated crime.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick
#11,785
#11,785
Septic said:
Let me make sure I understand this, your argument is that because the FBI survieled Carter Page and one of its thousands of agents doesn't like Trump - nothing that the Bureau does or says is from there on out is credible? This is the hill where you're planting your flag? Goodness...

It appears as if there is sufficient logical evidence for the FBIs classification of Qanon being a source of domestic terrorism as was noted by the article. The violence, murders and numerous arrests set a clear, convincing and rational stage for the DT label. Or are you simply going to refuse to acknowledge these crimes being directly tied to Qanon followers? Pretend they don't exist, plug your ears and scream about Peter Strzok?

These aren't shadows, people are hurting other people and admitting to being radicalized by these nutty theories. I get that it's inconvenient, but trying to poison the well of the FBI by pointing at a wholly unrelated transgression is what's weak.

Q's record sucks, Ms. Cleo threw less garbage against the wall and got more of it to stick - with none of the associated crime.
Click to expand...
3929
Apr 10, 2020 12:42:54 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
Patriots: be cautious in your interpretations of info posted. False expectations [& push] based on 'speculation' will only weaponize those who attack us [MSM]. Why does [MSM] expend resources [daily] attempting to discredit? Do you provide the playbook to the enemy w: specific dates? Logical thinking. FISA INDICTMENTS = START (public_justice) Definition of START Future proves past [events unlock]. Think CEO departures. Think FBI departures. Think DOJ departures. Think State departures. Think WH departures. Think DIA departures. Think Pentagon departures. Think Senate departures. Think House departures. Think Amb departures. Think IG departures. Think Judge install. Think SC install. Think WH install. Think FBI install. Think C_A install. Think DOJ install. Think US ATT install. ................ Game theory. If you look you can see. Q

Patriots: be cautious in your interpretations of info posted. False expectations [& push] based on 'speculation' will only weaponize those who attack us [MSM]. Why does [MSM] expend resources [daily] attempting to discredit? Do you provide the playbook to the enemy w: specific dates?

Be careful septic. BOOM!😂😱👍
 
#11,787
#11,787
Orange defense said:
3929
Apr 10, 2020 12:42:54 PM EDT
Q !!Hs1Jq13jV6
Patriots: be cautious in your interpretations of info posted. False expectations [& push] based on 'speculation' will only weaponize those who attack us [MSM]. Why does [MSM] expend resources [daily] attempting to discredit? Do you provide the playbook to the enemy w: specific dates? Logical thinking. FISA INDICTMENTS = START (public_justice) Definition of START Future proves past [events unlock]. Think CEO departures. Think FBI departures. Think DOJ departures. Think State departures. Think WH departures. Think DIA departures. Think Pentagon departures. Think Senate departures. Think House departures. Think Amb departures. Think IG departures. Think Judge install. Think SC install. Think WH install. Think FBI install. Think C_A install. Think DOJ install. Think US ATT install. ................ Game theory. If you look you can see. Q

Patriots: be cautious in your interpretations of info posted. False expectations [& push] based on 'speculation' will only weaponize those who attack us [MSM]. Why does [MSM] expend resources [daily] attempting to discredit? Do you provide the playbook to the enemy w: specific dates?

Be careful septic. BOOM!😂😱👍
Click to expand...

All I see is the sowing of excuse seeds for its failure to deliver on the predictions.
 
#11,790
#11,790
9a503c8a44be4e9e5cbdef59ad4f3b41.jpg
 
#11,791
#11,791
Septic said:
Let me make sure I understand this, your argument is that because the FBI survieled Carter Page and one of its thousands of agents doesn't like Trump - nothing that the Bureau does or says is from there on out is credible? This is the hill where you're planting your flag? Goodness...

It appears as if there is sufficient logical evidence for the FBIs classification of Qanon being a source of domestic terrorism as was noted by the article. The violence, murders and numerous arrests set a clear, convincing and rational stage for the DT label. Or are you simply going to refuse to acknowledge these crimes being directly tied to Qanon followers? Pretend they don't exist, plug your ears and scream about Peter Strzok?

These aren't shadows, people are hurting other people and admitting to being radicalized by these nutty theories. I get that it's inconvenient, but trying to poison the well of the FBI by pointing at a wholly unrelated transgression is what's weak.

Q's record sucks, Ms. Cleo threw less garbage against the wall and got more of it to stick - with none of the associated crime.
Click to expand...
I didn't even make it past the first paragraph. My point is that the FBI has dog in this narrative fight, so take their guilt by association campaign with a grain of salt.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#11,792
#11,792
Septic said:
Let me make sure I understand this, your argument is that because the FBI survieled Carter Page and one of its thousands of agents doesn't like Trump - nothing that the Bureau does or says is from there on out is credible? This is the hill where you're planting your flag? Goodness...

It appears as if there is sufficient logical evidence for the FBIs classification of Qanon being a source of domestic terrorism as was noted by the article. The violence, murders and numerous arrests set a clear, convincing and rational stage for the DT label. Or are you simply going to refuse to acknowledge these crimes being directly tied to Qanon followers? Pretend they don't exist, plug your ears and scream about Peter Strzok?

These aren't shadows, people are hurting other people and admitting to being radicalized by these nutty theories. I get that it's inconvenient, but trying to poison the well of the FBI by pointing at a wholly unrelated transgression is what's weak.

Q's record sucks, Ms. Cleo threw less garbage against the wall and got more of it to stick - with none of the associated crime.
Click to expand...
Sounds like you’re getting desperate / exasperated

I know you’ve seriously considered the possibility you are wrong since you’ve consistently trolled this thread from day 1 (posts 2, 4 and 6 to be precise)
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#11,793
#11,793
ajvol01 said:
Sounds like you’re getting desperate / exasperated

I know you’ve seriously considered the possibility you are wrong since you’ve consistently trolled this thread from day 1 (posts 2, 4 and 6 to be precise)
Click to expand...
But, he was good at pointing out that the story of the Kentucky Governor taking down license plate numbers of people going to church Sunday was fake news.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
#11,799
#11,799
utvolpj said:
Again, so what? The reaches are getting crazy in here. The constant attempts to tie regular, idiomatic phrases to this recent movement is grasping at straws
Click to expand...
Tim Tebow made the tweet. Septic commented, I replied in the manner I did because this is the Q thread. I made no statement as to Tim Tebow and his beliefs. I know Tim tebow is a religious man. Are you done?
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, DynaLo and 1972 Grad
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top