volfanjustin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2009
- Messages
- 22,634
- Likes
- 23,597
So we shouldn't expect that of all politicians?
Yup, knew that was coming.
..the confirmed cases rate will outpace the lagging increased death rate.
I agree. The numbers are going to be skewed.I don't think anyone would deny that the counting is both over and under inclusive. But the reporting I've seen says the undercounting outstrips the overcounting. For example, in NYC something like 20-25 people die per day in their homes at this time of year. Currently, it's over 200 per day. Most of these people were never tested for COVID so their deaths won't be counted as a COVID death, even if it was their cause of death.
If I were trying to hang Trump by his shorts, I'd call it the worst argument I could have chosen.
Jan 11/12 - U.S. gets the virus genome sequencing and CDC begins developing test protocolJan 14 - The WHO states there was no evidence of human-human transmissionJan 20 - Human transmission is confirmed.Jan 21 - There are 555 worldwide cases. On this day the first U.S. case is found, using the CDC new test protocol.Jan 21 - A. Fauci: "Obviously we need to take it seriously and do the kinds of things that the CDC and DHS are doing, but this is not a major threat for the people in United States, and this is not something the citizens of the United States right now should be worried about”
Jan 22 - On a scale of 1-10, how worried should Trump be the following day?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Jan 26 - "The American people should not be worried or frightened by this. It's a very, very low risk to the United States," Dr. Fauci said on The CATS Roundtable. "It isn't something that the American public needs to worry about or be frightened about." Feb 17 - Fauci "I don't think people should be frightened, the risk right now, today currently is really relatively low for the American public. But that could change with China and other countries, this could evolve into a global pandemic, which would have significant implications for us. We don't want people to worry so be more worried about influenza which is going through a second peak." Risk of coronavirus in U.S. is 'minuscule' NIH's Dr. Anthony Fauci says Feb 29 - Restated what he's been saying all month of Feb, things could change but don't worry, no need to change anything you're doing. Dr. Fauci on coronavirus fears: No need to change lifestyle yetMar 27 - Director Redfield agreed with Dr. Fauci's assessment, saying that at that time in January the information coming out of China suggested "they were pretty certain that this was not transmitted human to human.""Obviously that became corrected as they saw in the first three, four weeks in January that human to human spread was not only occurring it's actually, as I said, more infectious and I think that led to the situation that we're in today. I think no one could have predicted how transmissible, how infectious this virus really is," he added.Again, through Jan and Feb, Trump and the task force medical/pandemics are on the same page.It doesn't get better for your argument in March, either.
That depends on what your argument is. I'm simply calling Trump a liar for trying to revise history and claim that:
"I've always known this is a - this is a real - this is a pandemic. I've felt it was a pandemic long before it was called a pandemic. All you had to do was look at other countries... No, I've always viewed it as very serious." - President Donald Trump
The Facts: Not once did Trump describe the COVID-19 outbreak as a possible pandemic until after the World Health Organization declared it so on March 11th. To the contrary, prior to March 11th, Trump repeatedly suggested the virus was under control and that cases were going down, not up. I understand that Trump has been in lock-step with Dr. Fauci and health care professionals... I also understand that his claim that he was calling the Coronavirus a pandemic prior to the WHO on March 11th... is an outright lie.
Hell yes we should !!!!
A huge part of why we are in the desperate situation we are with this idiot in office is that we accept the one least like the imaginary boogeyman on the other side.
We return once again to the principle that your party largely did not care for Trump. But his campaign just made him the anti-Clinton.
Now you are stuck defending his incompetence. How many times a day do you find yourself having to say, or write, "Well, what he meant to say was ...."
They have an entire team at the WH who does nothing but come up with ways to make excuses, dodges, and clarifications for Trumps verbal diarrhea.