Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

How many times did @AirVol post that video of Michelle dancing on Ellen where she supposedly had a wang? But hell hath no fury like volnation aghast at a pun on Barron's name.
It is what it is on here. You get chastised for making fun of the board's favorite at the moment (which can turn on a dime, look at freshly adorned Comrade Lee). But otherwise, say whatever in the hell you want about those durty librulz.
 
Way back earlier in this thread, possibly Jan, i posted an article where research showed several early patients had no contact with that market or anyone in it. The original case had nothing to do with that market or anyone that went there.

Really hard to say. How good was the contact tracing? Now some are saying it can be transferred through aerosols by just breathing and talking.
 
Way back earlier in this thread, possibly Jan, i posted an article where research showed several early patients had no contact with that market or anyone in it. The original case had nothing to do with that market or anyone that went there.
Yet some of our leaders in Washington still speak about the wet market as the presumed point of origin.

No excuse for not keeping them closed forever, but China needs their feet held to the fire.
 
It is what it is on here. You get chastised for making fun of the board's favorite at the moment (which can turn on a dime, look at freshly adorned Comrade Lee). But otherwise, say whatever in the hell you want about those durty librulz.

I got blasted for posting Reagan asking in 1980 whether you're better off now than you were 4 years ago, which has long been considered a touchstone question that people ask when considering an incumbent.
 
Really hard to say. How good was the contact tracing? Now some are saying it can be transferred through aerosols by just breathing and talking.
I don't pretend to be an expert/epidemiologist but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelmingly pointing at that biohazard lab a block from the wet market.

Or don't they teach that in top 5 law schools?
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40
Dr Fauci not on again so it’s another waste of time. But I don’t need to watch because I know what Pompous Maximus is going to say no matter what the question is: “We’re doing the greatest job anybody has ever seen. Or—Nobody could do it better. Or—I’ve given you perfect answers.” Am I right? Also, told you last week that 50% approval rating wouldn’t last. That has sunk back to normal levels now at around 40% and going down. He’s back in his lane.
Great. Not only are you a sexist (dismissing Dr. Birx's opinions because she is a female), but you are also a racist (dismissing the opinions of Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams because he is black). Only an old white man's knowledge will suffice for you liberals.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tennesseefan2019
I don't pretend to be an expert/epidemiologist but the circumstantial evidence is overwhelmingly pointing at that biohazard lab a block from the wet market.

Or don't they teach that in top 5 law schools?

What's that overwhelming evidence you're pointing at?
 
I got blasted for posting Reagan asking in 1980 whether you're better off now than you were 4 years ago, which has long been considered a touchstone question that people ask when considering an incumbent.

BS. In the context of this pandemic, which is so illogical to the value of Reagan's statement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol
Really guys, "The Right Scoop?"
Since I edited my post afterwards and it's at the bottom of the previous page

Wuhan seafood market may not be source of novel virus spreading globally

As confirmed cases of a novel virus surge around the world with worrisome speed, all eyes have so far focused on a seafood market in Wuhan, China, as the origin of the outbreak. But a description of the first clinical cases published in The Lancet on Friday challenges that hypothesis.

The paper, written by a large group of Chinese researchers from several institutions, offers details about the first 41 hospitalized patients who had confirmed infections with what has been dubbed 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). In the earliest case, the patient became ill on 1 December 2019 and had no reported link to the seafood market, the authors report. “No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases,” they state. Their data also show that, in total, 13 of the 41 cases had no link to the marketplace. “That’s a big number, 13, with no link,” says Daniel Lucey, an infectious disease specialist at Georgetown University.

Lucey says if the new data are accurate, the first human infections must have occurred in November 2019—if not earlier—because there is an incubation time between infection and symptoms surfacing. If so, the virus possibly spread silently between people in Wuhan—and perhaps elsewhere—before the cluster of cases from the city’s now-infamous Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market was discovered in late December. “The virus came into that marketplace before it came out of that marketplace,” Lucey asserts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vols40
So I saw some of the conditions CDC I suggesting in order for a city to return to “normal”. One includes no new cases for two weeks. If that is truly mandated you can kiss the economy goodbye. Zero cases in a country of 330M is ridiculous. This could linger for months as holed up people come in contact with asymptomatic folks at the end of their illness. Short of bringing the army into the streets and imposing curfews I don’t see this happening without us being confined for a really long time. How this is possibly better than the virus I don’t know.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Weezy and allvol123
Advertisement

Back
Top