Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

#27,401
#27,401
lawgator1 said:
Fauci under attack from the right.

This is disturbing, to say the least.

Medical Expert Who Corrects Trump Is Now a Target of the Far Right






This is what worries me the most and is exactly why I have been so critical of Trump. His dismissiveness, his calling the State Department the "Deep State," and crap like that just feeds this narrative that the virus isn't that big a threat.
Click to expand...
70’people tweeting bad things about Fauci..... lol I can’t believe someone wrote this idiotic story.
 
#27,404
#27,404
McDad said:
Yeah. There is so much uncertainty right now. I hope and pray it doesn't get that bad. But no one knows. I just have to lean on my faith.
Click to expand...
2 Corinthians 1:3 Praise be to the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of compassion and the God of all comfort, 4 who comforts us in all our troubles, so that we can comfort those in any trouble with the comfort we ourselves receive from God. 5 For just as we share abundantly in the sufferings of Christ, so also our comfort abounds through Christ.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, jp1, DixieVol and 2 others
#27,406
#27,406
Stew Cook said:
Meeting was on the 29th. Found this, which might explain not finding the minutes, if they really aren't available:

Exclusive: White House told federal health agency to classify coronavirus deliberations - sources

The cynic in me wonders why, and if this one of the meetings which spawned insider trading accusations.
Click to expand...
Loeffler was just appointed last year, and she was obvious in what she was doing.

Loeffler reports more stock sales amid insider trading allegations
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stew Cook
#27,407
#27,407
titansvolsfaninga said:
You don't come across as non-partisan or as a Constitutionalist. Your talking points line up with Right Leaning talking points. If you were truly either, I would think you would be incensed that Clinton be brought up on charges. Instead, you're like the Clintons are above the law, like they are Political royalty. If you said Kennedy's or Rockerfeller, or some other uber rich family, I would agree. You have an unwarranted hatred for Hillary.
Click to expand...
I have a confessed hatred of Hillary. Never denied it. And I absolutely believe she should have been brought up on charges. But reality has shown us some people are to big to take down. Case in point, Ted Kennedy. How many times was he re-elected to Congress after being responsible for the death of a young woman? Certain people are unjustly above the law. The Clintons are in that category.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dillyo51 and DynaLo
#27,409
#27,409
Stew Cook said:
No, it's just the reality of what politics have devolved to. If you need more evidence, just look at the attitude change when Trump's views suddenly aligned with Fauci.
Click to expand...
Yeah I need more evidence than 70, 70, random people on twitter having a problem with something.

There are more flat earthers than that
Give me a freaking break you guys are digging deep for this nonsense. You are literally below flat earthers right now. Enjoy space, or the giant turtle or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1 and McDad
#27,410
#27,410
Rasputin_Vol said:
That's all I need to know...
Click to expand...

Curious.... The fact that Bill and Melinda Gate made a contribution to a health organization, is that a good thing or a bad thing in your opinion? Regardless of how you perceive the Gates contribution do you think that has some impact on the quality and bias/unbias nature of what they have done?
 
#27,411
#27,411
LouderVol said:
Yeah I need more evidence than 70, 70, random people on twitter having a problem with something.

There are more flat earthers than that
Give me a freaking break you guys are digging deep for this nonsense. You are literally below flat earthers right now. Enjoy space, or the giant turtle or whatever.
Click to expand...

Easy to do, watch whats going down on social media. Some will say, "who cares about social media?", but this is where most of the battles are being fought.

Probably not random people, more likely disinformation machines.
 
#27,412
#27,412
GoDucks349 said:
Curious.... The fact that Bill and Melinda Gate made a contribution to a health organization, is that a good thing or a bad thing in your opinion? Regardless of how you perceive the Gates contribution do you think that has some impact on the quality and bias/unbias nature of what they have done?
Click to expand...
Bama cut me a check for 270 million bucks and I will be yelling Roll Tide like the rest of my family. Screw you guys and the Vols, 270 million is some serious money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McDad
#27,414
#27,414
Stew Cook said:
Easy to do, watch whats going down on social media. Some will say, "who cares about social media?", but this is where most of the battles are being fought.
Click to expand...
By 70 random people. What's that as a percentage? You have gone to the literal extremes of the social media universe to find double digit negative opinions of a public figure associated with Trump.

I can find more to argue with about the color of the sky right now, or the color of a dress.

But if that's the level of evidence you need, you do you.
 
#27,415
#27,415
Stew Cook said:
No, it's just the reality of what politics have evolved (devolved?) to. If you need more evidence, just look at the attitude change when Trump's views suddenly aligned with Fauci.
Click to expand...
Trumps views were always aligned with Fauci.... he has followed his guideline pretty close the entire time but they will always differ some bc Fauci is strictly worried about the infection side of things where as trump/congress has to worry about the entire country as a whole.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher, 1972 Grad, DixieVol and 1 other person
#27,416
#27,416
37L1 said:
This post contains so much BS.

No one likes the bearer of bad news, it's as simple as that.

Our country/society has had to adjust to accepting the extreme nature of what this virus is bringing to us, that effects both a physical and mental state.

We should quarantine the hot spots. It's logical and exactly what the People's Republic of China did. What was the reaction when that concept was floated? DeBlasio just about had a stroke. Can't blame him.

When Trump curtailed all travel from China, what was the reaction to that? Pelosi and the gang labeled "racist." Inappropriate.

When we were told to stay home and not go to work, social distance, curtail all unnecessary travel, etc. . .? Hard pill to swallow.

No one likes this radical change in our life status. We all have balked at it and some have vented towards those "responsible", be it, Dr. Fauci, Donald Trump, Communist China.

We are all looking for someone to blame for such a nasty predicament. Still, it doesn't justify it and it sure as hell doesn't need to be brought up as if it is all one side or the other. It's divisive and really not helping one damn thing. You aren't going to change those fools and trying to paint others with the same broad brush is a reflection on you.
Click to expand...


Its not that simple as a "blame game." The "far right" is a necessarily sweeping statement in the article because its an article. You can't break it down into too many specific subparts. And as I have said, I give Trump credit for at this point yielding to the advice he's getting, even if his instincts are to minimize further.
 
#27,418
#27,418
LouderVol said:
By 70 random people. What's that as a percentage? You have gone to the literal extremes of the social media universe to find double digit negative opinions of a public figure associated with Trump.

I can find more to argue with about the color of the sky right now, or the color of a dress.

But if that's the level of evidence you need, you do you.
Click to expand...
Yep..... I’m on twitter constantly and have never ever seen that hashtag...... you will never make 100% of the people no matter who is the person people Agree no matter who or what is being discussed.
 
Last edited:
#27,420
#27,420
LouderVol said:
By 70 random people. What's that as a percentage? You have gone to the literal extremes of the social media universe to find double digit negative opinions of a public figure associated with Trump.

I can find more to argue with about the color of the sky right now, or the color of a dress.

But if that's the level of evidence you need, you do you.
Click to expand...



I'm not overly worried that that you don't understand. I think you will eventually.

I'm not demanding that you see the bigger picture, or demeaning you, which is the main tactic deployed against dissenting voices. That has become the new normal as well.
 
#27,421
#27,421
lawgator1 said:
Its not that simple as a "blame game." The "far right" is a necessarily sweeping statement in the article because its an article. You can't break it down into too many specific subparts. And as I have said, I give Trump credit for at this point yielding to the advice he's getting, even if his instincts are to minimize further.
Click to expand...
Congrats on defining the far right as 0.0001% of American Twitter.

You really will get upset at anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#27,422
#27,422
Stew Cook said:
I'm not overly worried that that you don't understand. I think you will eventually.

I'm not demanding that you see the bigger picture, or demeaning you, which is the main tactic deployed against dissenting voices. That has become the new normal as well.
Click to expand...
Apparently .0001% of the twitter population is enough to oppress you despite not being involved in the matter at all.

I guess we are back to where we were previously on your opinion of Fauci. I am sure that has never once faltered at all no matter how much praise he heaps on Trump.
 
#27,423
#27,423
LouderVol said:
Apparently .0001% of the twitter population is enough to oppress you despite not being involved in the matter at all.

I guess we are back to where we were previously on your opinion of Fauci. I am sure that has never once faltered at all no matter how much praise he heaps on Trump.
Click to expand...

It's not about the percentage of the Twitter population, it's like Fauci says, "It's about community spread."
 
  • Like
Reactions: Purple Tiger
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top