he said "only" enough for the immediate need, implying they need more and can't get it.
View attachment 268477
its good that companies are volunteering to help. i commend the administration for making hat happen. but getting the supplies made is only half the battle, there's a serious logistical vacuum right now as states are battling for supplies as they're made available instead of there being a coordinated federal effort. a letter signed by more than 100 current and former national security professionals, including former Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, outlines as much:
“Some private companies have been willing and able to scale up production — and admirably so,” the letter says. “But as governors and local leaders around the country are making clear, private efforts without more extensive government support are proving far from sufficient to meet the current and anticipated needs. Beyond questions of supply,
the private sector lacks the ability to process incoming requests, prioritize the most urgent needs, and coordinate with other companies absent more concerted government involvement. That is precisely what the DPA is designed to do.”
lol. not because it's funny, but because it's true. discussed A LOT a couple weeks ago when we were talking about being dependent on China and other Asian countries for manufacturing (and Mexico)....and there it is in black and white.
as for the supply chain....i would take issue with his comments about that....the supply chain is up and running, and for the most part, running normal....as more and more communities/counties/states go under some form of shelter at home or other quarantine measures, as we've seen many businesses are not opearting at all right now....so there will be a point, the longer this goes on, that Capacity will start to expand in Logistics networks. right now, volume being moved is relatively flat. i know for my company, we've seen no real drop off in #of shipments per day.....and many other carriers are seeing the same. some are seeing increased shipment counts....
lastly, the anticipated need is still being based on numbers of worst case scenario....which, as someone that works in prevention, that's usually where i start too, and work backwards from there. but there has to be an understanding that while that outcome is possible, it's also unlikely and would require a specific set of circumstances to come to fruition.
if they have enough for immediate need, does that # suffice, IF current spread control measures are working? if yes, does that also provide enough time to either get ventilators....from other sources that DON"T anticipate the same needs for worsening conditions...or.....manufactured and shipped.....?
we never hear those discussions....and some might assume they're not taking place. until yesterday when Dr. Brix offered up some of these notions to consider when we present these topics to the masses.
why is it ok, even encouraged, that we should always question "the establishment", but not question the people that tell us we need to be questioning it?
none of this means that we don't need more supplies. we do. but for most people in most locations across the country, this isn't going to be as serious as an issue as it is probably in NYC. and even there, while it's bad, and urgent, it's not like there aren't steps being taken right now to remedy that issue.
the truth is in the middle folks....where i live, im not as concerned as i might be if i lived in manhattan....or New Orleans, cause LA is apparently getting hit hard due to the mardi gras travel a few weeks ago. they're not really in the news much....but probably as dire a situation as NYC.