Latest Coronavirus - Yikes

What percent of front line medical workers are vaccinated against both the flu and Covid-19?

That's the issue. This is not a partisan question. You should be able to answer it directly and honestly without deflection, re-direction, or subject changing. Let's see if you can?

There is no Cov19 vaccine. Hope that helps.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I40flyer
Libs will be quick to piously point out that Harvard’s $40bn endowment is allocated to various efforts/investments and not just a free-for-all... as if Harvard doesn’t have enough petty cash to pay these salaries for a year with billions left over.

Loons, the lot of ‘em.

HARVARD receives Millions from; believe it or not----CHINA!
 
Unless the vast majority of AIDS patients are elderly, probably not. Maybe there is more of a correlation because they are large metropolitan areas with a diverse ethnic population that travels the world a lot. I don't know.
I don't think what you've stated stands up to fact. Who cares if the vast majority of aids patients are elderly or not-I'd only be interested in the number of aids patients that have died from the virus. The vast majority of aids patients may have a "I love mom" tattoo that is several years old, But I'd still only be interested in the number of people that died from the virus, and how many of them were taking the aids meds or had the aids and were not taking the meds. If I had two groups, elderly and those with immune problems, I would separate the two sets out. For example: of the 550 that have died 450 were above the age of 70, in the 100 below that age the average age was 45-81 was taking aids medication. Then we'd have some data worth looking at. This was an example and an example only, just to make a point and nothing more. If I don't make this statement, some low life piece of trash will ask where I got that data, blahblahblah, as they are too high to understand "Just to make a point".
 
You posted the opinion of one guy when the evidence didn't back it up. There was nothing but hearsay and assumption. Period. I watched every minute of the testimony, including the parts where the star witnesses said that their accusations that Trump tied the aid to the investigation was based on assumption, and not having spoken to Trump on the matter.

Quote as many opinions as you want. They're little better than yours when the testimony was what the testimony was.

Like I said... Trump has gone through 3 1/2 years of investigation harrassment from his political enemies that vowed to impeach him before he took his oath. This has been an obvious case of looking for crimes to hang on a political enemy.

There has been no proof that Trump took any active participation in any Biden investigation. And considering the cheering you've done for your team against Trump, kick rocks. You haven't a shred of dignity to accuse anyone of bending over backwards to give anyone the benefit of the doubt.
If you think that Sen. Lamar Alexander didn't get clearance from Sen. Mitch McConnell to release that statement then you are in denial of how things work in the Senate. It is likely that the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, helped to draft it and that statement does nothing but assert what the established facts are. Senate Republicans didn't want John Bolton to testify because they knew it would only serve to reinforce the belief that Trump withheld aid to the Ukraine in order to encourage an investigation into the Bidens.

Also, it is delusional to say that Trump didn't take an active part of an investigation into the Bidens when he not only withheld aid to encourage it, but openly spoke about such an investigation on the July 25th phone call.

You are just another Trump fanboy spouting unconditional support in the face of undeniable facts. It's fealty on top of being delusional.
 
Chinese Propaganda Video Cites CNN, Democratic Politicians to Push Regime Narrative

Regime outlet cites CNN, NBC, Hillary Clinton to deny Chinese responsibility for outbreak

China's state-run propaganda outlets are using coronavirus coverage by U.S. media and Democratic politicians to push the regime narrative that the Chinese government bears no responsibility for the ongoing pandemic and that sourcing the origin of the virus to Wuhan is politically motivated.

GettyImages-1206419810_736x514-736x514.jpg


A video posted Monday by the Global Times, a tabloid run by the Communist Party of China, uses footage of numerous American media outlets and Democratic politicians to portray criticism of China's handling of the coronavirus as racist. In addition to citing CNN's Chris Cuomo and NBC's Richard Engel, the video highlights tweets from two-time failed Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and New York City mayor Bill de Blasio parroting regime talking points.

"It is easy to scapegoat people, and that is what has always happened when there have been pandemics or epidemics," Engel says in the clip featured in the video. "This is a virus that came from the territory of China but came from bats. This is a bat virus, not a China virus."


In another video posted Sunday, Global Times editor in chief Hu Xijin highlights a CNN opinion piece by Chris Cillizza that argues President Donald Trump is "weaponizing bigotry" to shift blame away from his administration. After questioning the virus's point of origin in Wuhan, Xijin cites Cillizza's piece as evidence that Trump is using China as a political "scapegoat for his government's slow response."​



The videos are part of a larger Chinese effort to deflect responsibility for the pandemic, which has spread across the globe since China covered up the December outbreak in Wuhan. Chinese diplomats have worked simultaneously to shift blame away from the communist state. China's embassy in France pointed on Monday to a Daily Beast report on the Trump administration's efforts to ensure China's role in the worldwide crisis is known, labeling them "naughty tactics."​

CAREFUL IN HERE! The audacity to post the truth is frowned upon by the Sheep.
 
What percent of front line medical workers are vaccinated against both the flu and Covid-19?

That's the issue. This is not a partisan question. You should be able to answer it directly and honestly without deflection, re-direction, or subject changing. Let's see if you can?
It doesn’t matter when more people will die from the flu, do we shut the country down over the flu?
 
  • Like
Reactions: I40flyer
I don't think what you've stated stands up to fact. Who cares if the vast majority of aids patients are elderly or not-I'd only be interested in the number of aids patients that have died from the virus. The vast majority of aids patients may have a "I love mom" tattoo that is several years old, But I'd still only be interested in the number of people that died from the virus, and how many of them were taking the aids meds or had the aids and were not taking the meds. If I had two groups, elderly and those with immune problems, I would separate the two sets out. For example: of the 550 that have died 450 were above the age of 70, in the 100 below that age the average age was 45-81 was taking aids medication. Then we'd have some data worth looking at. This was an example and an example only, just to make a point and nothing more. If I don't make this statement, some low life piece of trash will ask where I got that data, blahblahblah, as they are too high to understand "Just to make a point".
Your point does not seem to be worth making. What difference does it make, really?
 
Biden: ‘We Have To Take Care Of The Cure’ For COVID-19. ‘That Will Make The Problem Worse’

Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden delivered a confusing answer Tuesday when asked whether he was concerned that the coronavirus “cure” could be worse than the disease.

Biden: ‘We Have To Take Care Of The Cure’ For COVID-19. ‘That Will Make The Problem Worse’
The one thing I get out of this dribble, is he wants to make the problem worse! No surprise there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
Not really sensationalist when he says “we have to do that.”

Sucks that he’s incoherent but I don’t think it’s any better to simply pick the best possible interpretation of what he said and assume that’s what he actually meant.

I think he knows that Easter has something to do with Jesus, and by bringing it up, it increases the chances of that miracle Trump prophesied coming to fruition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
Advertisement

Back
Top