Looked at the study. Maybe it will work? That being said that's all anecdotal unknowns. I will say this though...I am enjoying a gin and tonic right now which has a very moderate amount of quinine and I'm feeling pretty immune.
Really hope everything is going well for you and yours brother. How's your wife doing?My sister in law I mentioned a few days ago who worked for tge Dr that didn't wanna test, she's now at home from work. They finally tested the same patient, and she was positive. So everyone there has went for days interacting like normal after someone who is positive has been in their office 3 times.
She's actually doing better than any surgery I've seen her have. I mean she's hurting from being cut on, but she's not out of it like she normally is. It usually takes her a couple of days to get back to normal, but she's already throwing water bottles at me for running my mouthReally hope everything is going well for you and yours brother. How's your wife doing?
I mentioned the exact same thing to the nurses that tested me, up until the covid-19 test they had cloth masks and gloves but nothing else. We where in a small room and they fully examined me like I didn't have it. As soon as I tested negative for the flu they went partial hazmat. I told them it was a little too late for that and they agreed and started venting to me about how they have been complaining about the same thing.
She's actually doing better than any surgery I've seen her have. I mean she's hurting from being cut on, but she's not out of it like she normally is. It usually takes her a couple of days to get back to normal, but she's already throwing water bottles at me for running my mouthand thanks brother.
We got to get her to throw glass bottles!She's actually doing better than any surgery I've seen her have. I mean she's hurting from being cut on, but she's not out of it like she normally is. It usually takes her a couple of days to get back to normal, but she's already throwing water bottles at me for running my mouthand thanks brother.
That's the interesting part about testing, too. What do you do with people who have the symptoms when test results aren't available for days? Fill up isolation beds with maybes, or potentially expose a lot of other people with maybe nots (because we don't know). And do you just let people test and overwhelm labs because enquiring minds want to know? I'm at the point that it seems like at this point what difference does it make ... except for statistics.
Patients tested are instructed to self-quarantine at home until results are knownThat's the interesting part about testing, too. What do you do with people who have the symptoms when test results aren't available for days? Fill up isolation beds with maybes, or potentially expose a lot of other people with maybe nots (because we don't know). And do you just let people test and overwhelm labs because enquiring minds want to know? I'm at the point that it seems like at this point what difference does it make ... except for statistics.
This might be a good topic for discussion in the politics forum because I would love to spill out my thoughts on this but I am afraid if done here it would be opening not one but two cans of worms and result in many of us getting "quarantined" from volation.
So, from what I've found, there are some promising reports. There is also some prior experience using it with other viral infections. I'm not quite sure what to make of the "study" you linked, bc it is not really a true investigational study...sounds more like self-reported case reports. Anything that might lead to a successful treatment is good with me, though, at this point! (So long as it doesn't have a significant risk of harm in and of itself)Doc, the Chloroquine study I posted above sounds promising doesn't it?
It really is more of a "where do we go from here?" deal with the testing. When you see some of the catastrophic models, it is imperative to get data quickly and monitor the spread and the effect we are having with isolation, social distancing, etc. Worst case scenario: if this doesn't work -- nation-wide lockdown.I actually left out a key ingredient - that there isn't a proven cure for it anyway. Generally you test to decide a course of action, but this time the course of action seems to be simply dealing with the symptoms/effects and knowing who to isolate. But the testing is generally an overcome by events kind of thing due to the delayed results.
Have you tested positive?(7) 3/18: As far as covid-19 symptoms I have felt as good today as I have felt during the whole ordeal. I am 60 to 70%. I am hoping my turn for the worse phase was Saturday and Sunday since everything I have read points to a turn for the worse phase happening between day 7 to 12. I had periods of fatigue and a little bit of shortness of breath but only when I over did it on the chores. I have had this "raw" feeling from my sinuses to my bronchial tubes all day. I think this is more due to the pollen combined with two deep nasal swabs the day before, when I went outside to get the garbage and mail it felt like I was inhaling sawdust. I have continued super dosing vitamin C. Today was the first day that I actually felt hungry instead of forcing myself to eat. Wine supply is running low and the next delivery I can get is next week. I am not sure yet what I am going to do about that. No test results. Symptoms: "Raw" sinuses, minor shortness of breath, minor fatigue.
To those asking about job situations. I work in a field that should not be majorly affected by the shutdown and my company has already extended the work from home program for at least two weeks, but with my situation they may have been a few days too late. Even though I have the option to work from home this week I have taken the week off.
I think it was from 40 cases in France. Here's the video of the guy explaining.So, from what I've found, there are some promising reports. There is also some prior experience using it with other viral infections. I'm not quite sure what to make of the "study" you linked, bc it is not really a true investigational study...sounds more like self-reported case reports. Anything that might lead to a successful treatment is good with me, though, at this point! (So long as it doesn't have a significant risk of harm in and of itself)
Good numbers. Really contagious. That’s the only scary part. But for 90% of people there’s really no threatThere seems to be a huge divide in mild/serious cases in the US....for say a mild positive with a 30 year old...would they be admitted or sent home for self quarantining?
View attachment 267152
Here it is folks, why the virus spread so fast across the entire world. It can remain airborne in certain conditions for 3 hours.
WHO considers 'airborne precautions' for medical staff after study shows coronavirus can survive in air
This might be a good topic for discussion in the politics forum because I would love to spill out my thoughts on this but I am afraid if done here it would be opening not one but two cans of worms and result in many of us getting "quarantined" from volation.