Gun control debate (merged)

#13,053
#13,053
NorthDallas40 said:
Another op-Ed this time from the New Yorker you put up as fact supporting your stance. Yes you do suck at cogent arguments and critical thinking clearly. Hopefully you only do pro bono work and aren’t getting paid 😂
Click to expand...
I get paid a lot for the legal services I provide. Remember, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they are idiots or can't be successful.
 
#13,056
#13,056
NorthDallas40 said:
LMFAO! The Atlantic has an op-Ed which you present as fact that puts limits on 2a. You absolutely have to suck at law, everyday lawyer 😂
Click to expand...
And as is typical, you just make fun of the article instead of actually providing a cogent argument as that would take a lot more thoughtfulness and intelligence than you are capable of.
 
#13,058
#13,058
bnhunt said:
I get paid a lot for the legal services I provide. Remember, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they are idiots or can't be successful.
Click to expand...
Shyster.

I think you are full of it and making this stuff up. If your "legal services" are anything like the lack of thought and logic that goes into your posts, you are ripping your "clients" off.

But there is a sucker born every minute.
And someone born to take advantage of them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, TNVOLNAVY, davethevol and 1 other person
#13,061
#13,061
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, dillyo51, InVOLuntary and 5 others
#13,064
#13,064
bnhunt said:
The Second Amendment Does Not Transcend All Others
"Its text and context don’t ensure an unlimited individual right to bear any kind and number of weapons by anyone."
The title of the article is perfect. You people think the 2A transcends all others.
Click to expand...

You are in a gun thread screeching about how we are always talking about our 2a . Think about that for a second . If you created a free speech thread or freedom of assembly , or freedom of religion thread we would be saying the same things about those rights .. you can’t have them . You just happen to have an issue with the ONE AND ONLY amendment that specifically forbids lawyers from INFRINGING on it .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol, Pepe_Silvia, NorthDallas40 and 2 others
#13,066
#13,066
bnhunt said:
I get paid a lot for the legal services I provide. Remember, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they are idiots or can't be successful.
Click to expand...
It’s sad you get paid at all based on your comments and statements here.

remember when we ask for proof we want actual proof not an opinion piece.

Toodles.
 
Last edited:
#13,067
#13,067
bnhunt said:
And as is typical, you just make fun of the article instead of actually providing a cogent argument as that would take a lot more thoughtfulness and intelligence than you are capable of.
Click to expand...
Actually you’re the one failing on a cogent argument. Op Ed’s are not proof. And Heller has been debated here ad nauseam
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 37L1
#13,068
#13,068
NorthDallas40 said:
It’s sad you get paid at all based on your comments and statements here.

remember when we ask for proof we want actual proof not an opinion piece.

Toodles.
Click to expand...
That one toof, beer gut, fat, nasty crack ho on the corner gets paid for her services too... Some clients need legal advice cause they aren't real bright or making good decisions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol
#13,069
#13,069
bag12day said:
That one toof, beer gut, fat, nasty crack ho on the corner gets paid for her services too... Some clients need legal advice cause they aren't real bright or making good decisions.
Click to expand...
Hiring that guy would be a continuation of making bad decisions based on this display of his mind at work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bag12day
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top