Should the Senate Allow Witnesses Be Called During the Impeachment Trial?

Should the Senate Call Witnesses to Testify During the Impeachment Trial?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 31 51.7%
  • No.

    Votes: 29 48.3%

  • Total voters
    60
Polls show two thirds of Americans want the Senate to subpoena documents and witnesses for the trial. Of course, Trump defied subpoenas from the House, and he would also defy subpoenas from the Senate. Instead of standing up for the Senate, McConnel knuckled under to Trump like the coward and criminal accessory he truly is. He has consigned the Republican Party to the garbage heap of history, as Reagan once said of the Soviet Union, "willing to tell any lie and commit any crime."
 
Oh look, luther finally has a friend as delusional and oblivious as he is.
lol..........I read the exchanges between you two. You took a beating.
Self-imposed blind ignorance has consequences.
 
That is a good question.
Why would anyone choose to remain uninformed?
We all know there is only one answer.
 
Yet you are struggling trying to keep up with all of us dumb hicks.[/QUOTE
I forgot the insanity of you all.

It is disgusting. One can only wonder that the Almighty has not opened a great hole in the Earth to send this devil taken lot straight to hell. I had to take a long bath last night to clean the filth of this place off me.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mick and luthervol
It would be fun to quote old Avenatti posts where folks clobbered all over themselves acting like he was credible.
Are you saying Trump didn't screw Stormy while his third wife was home with a newborn?
And that he didn't try to secretly coerce her silence through intimidation and bribery?
 
It's shocking at first, but then the shock gradually gives way to sadness, pity, and anger. However, it still requires an occasional therapeutic cleansing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vol Main
It is disgusting. One can only wonder that the Almighty has not opened a great hole in the Earth to send this devil taken lot straight to hell. I had to take a long bath last night to clean the filth of this place off me.

Oh, look. You are still here. More proof that one cannot believe you and what you post.
 
Oh, look. You are still here. More proof that one cannot believe you and what you post.

Let's get something clear. I do not serve Satan, so I do not like Trump and I do not like you. There is only one thing I want to ask of you. If/when you decide to eat one of your guns, please do not do it where any children will find you.
 
lol..........I read the exchanges between you two. You took a beating.
Self-imposed blind ignorance has consequences.
iu


LMAO, this coming from Mr. Willfully Ignorant.


That guy posted no facts to prove his assertion that Trump committed treason and no explanation on why charges of treason are not in the articles of impeachment. Instead he first tried ignore, then he tried "I'm on my cell, look it up for yourself", then straw man, dodge and red herring. Finally he vaguely addressed those issues with his "feelings" about how Trump had conducted foreign policy, without once showing any proof that a crime had been committed. Then some razzamatazz about Russia and a German bank. There was the whole, motive, means and opportunity BS, when those just being present does not always mean a crime has to have occured. I think he's still pulling his panties out on that one.

You say I took a beating? LMFAO, you are something else, not sure what, but definitely something else. Maybe you would like to stand in for him? Come on, take your beating too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Let's get something clear. I do not serve Satan, so I do not like Trump and I do not like you. There is only one thing I want to ask of you. If/when you decide to eat one of your guns, please do not do it where any children will find you.
LMAO. You sure are a "triggered" little snowflake aintcha?
 
iu


LMAO, this coming from Mr. Willfully Ignorant.


That guy posted no facts to prove his assertion that Trump committed treason and no explanation on why charges of treason are not in the articles of impeachment. Instead he first tried ignore, then he tried "I'm on my cell, look it up for yourself", then straw man, dodge and red herring. Finally he vaguely addressed those issues with his "feelings" about how Trump had conducted foreign policy, without once showing any proof that a crime had been committed. Then some razzamatazz about Russia and a German bank. There was the whole, motive, means and opportunity BS, when those just being present does not always mean a crime has to have occured. I think he's still pulling his panties out on that one.

You say I took a beating? LMFAO, you are something else, not sure what, but definitely something else. Maybe you would like to stand in for him? Come on, take your beating too.
It's tough defending blind ignorance.
Keep supporting the suppression of truth as you claim to seek and value the truth.

How did you vote in this poll?
 
It's tough defending blind ignorance.
Keep supporting the suppression of truth as you claim to seek and value the truth.

How did you vote in this poll?
How do you think? I know how you voted, don't have to ask.

The House stupidly sent an incomplete investigation over as articles of impeachment. Now wrap yourself up in "troof" to cover up the failure at trying to railroad something through without sufficient information or even in a fair and impartial way. Doing it the way the Democrats did, without a single member from the opposition voting for it, and, in fact, having a Democrat or two in opposition as well, should tell you that your party did not take this action as seriously as they should have. Purely a political move trying to undo an election that surprised and disappointed them and within 10 months of a new election to fill the office. A party, that coincidentally, has had members pushing for impeachment since the day of Trump's election and before he even took office. A party that already had entertained several motions for impeachment before this one.

Who can believe your party anymore, that they are seeking "truth"? It's a joke and the end result of this process was already baked into the pie and y'all act surprised and shocked at what you see as the callous disregard for "truth".

What a freaking joke you are.
 
How do you think? I know how you voted, don't have to ask.

The House stupidly sent an incomplete investigation over as articles of impeachment. Now wrap yourself up in "troof" to cover up the failure at trying to railroad something through without sufficient information or even in a fair and impartial way. Doing it the way the Democrats did, without a single member from the opposition voting for it, and, in fact, having a Democrat or two in opposition as well, should tell you that your party did not take this action as seriously as they should have. Purely a political move trying to undo an election that surprised and disappointed them and within 10 months of a new election to fill the office. A party, that coincidentally, has had members pushing for impeachment since the day of Trump's election and before he even took office. A party that already had entertained several motions for impeachment before this one.

Who can believe your party anymore, that they are seeking "truth"? It's a joke and the end result of this process was already baked into the pie and y'all act surprised and shocked at what you see as the callous disregard for "truth".

What a freaking joke you are.
So I take it you are embarrassed to answer the question?
 
Are you saying Trump didn't screw Stormy while his third wife was home with a newborn?
And that he didn't try to secretly coerce her silence through intimidation and bribery?
Are you saying you all were not pushing him to be the dem nominee for President?
Are you saying for a span of about 3 months he wasn't the hero of the left?
 
How do you think? I know how you voted, don't have to ask.

The House stupidly sent an incomplete investigation over as articles of impeachment. Now wrap yourself up in "troof" to cover up the failure at trying to railroad something through without sufficient information or even in a fair and impartial way. Doing it the way the Democrats did, without a single member from the opposition voting for it, and, in fact, having a Democrat or two in opposition as well, should tell you that your party did not take this action as seriously as they should have. Purely a political move trying to undo an election that surprised and disappointed them and within 10 months of a new election to fill the office. A party, that coincidentally, has had members pushing for impeachment since the day of Trump's election and before he even took office. A party that already had entertained several motions for impeachment before this one.

Who can believe your party anymore, that they are seeking "truth"? It's a joke and the end result of this process was already baked into the pie and y'all act surprised and shocked at what you see as the callous disregard for "truth".

What a freaking joke you are.

There's 100% of truth in this post but the blue hatters are too stupid to see it.
 
Are you saying you all were not pushing him to be the dem nominee for President?
Are you saying for a span of about 3 months he wasn't the hero of the left?
I don't know of anyone who was pushing him to be the dem nominee.
Anyone who assists in rightfully and legally bringing down Trump has some heroic qualities.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top