The Impeachment Thread

#33,176
#33,176
saw a video where Pelosi gets really testy when asked about when she'll send the articles over. trying to find it. not a good look for her
 
#33,177
#33,177
volinbham said:
why should they even have to request it? this was work the House did. Schiff made selective releases. If they care about getting all the facts out then he can do that now without any action from the Senate. Wonder why he hasn't?
Click to expand...

Adam is the guy in the room that everyone knows is doing bad things and he's just hoping that if he keeps his head down long enough not making eye contact that no one will call on him
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and 0nelilreb
#33,178
#33,178
volinbham said:
why should they even have to request it? this was work the House did. Schiff made selective releases. If they care about getting all the facts out then he can do that now without any action from the Senate. Wonder why he hasn't?
Click to expand...
To hear Republicans beat their chest complaining. Excellent work by Nancy, trolling redhats. If it's such exoneration the Senate would surely call him to testify. When they don't, complain about them, while demanding "transparency". Forgotten word in this Administration.
 
#33,179
#33,179
Mick said:
To hear Republicans beat their chest complaining. Excellent work by Nancy, trolling redhats. If it's such exoneration the Senate would surely call him to testify. When they don't, complain about them, while demanding "transparency". Forgotten word in this Administration.
Click to expand...

non-answer. Schiff should release all his investigatory work. Why won't he?
 
#33,180
#33,180
volinbham said:
non-answer. Schiff should release all his investigatory work. Why won't he?
Click to expand...
It's just political posturing by Nunes. If there is something there, it will come out. Wonder if they will find out why ICIG delayed getting congress the credible whistle blower complaint. It still seem like an attempt to officially expose the whistleblower and that is why it's not been publicly released to begin with.
 
Last edited:
#33,181
#33,181
Mick said:
It's just political posturing by Nunes. If there is something there, it will come out. Wonder if they will find out why ICIG delayed getting congress the credible whistle blower complaint. It still seem like an attempt to officially expose the whistleblower.
Click to expand...

The non whistle blower? The CIA agent Eric C? This whistleblower?
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#33,183
#33,183
Mick said:
It's just political posturing by Nunes. If there is something there, it will come out. Wonder if they will find out why ICIG delayed getting congress the credible whistle blower complaint. It still seem like an attempt to officially expose the whistleblower and that is why it's not been publicly released to begin with.
Click to expand...

It's not just Nunes. There are multiple transcripts from witnesses other than the ICIG that were part of the impeachment inquiry that Schiff has chosen not to release. Why won't he put it all out there?
 
#33,185
#33,185
volinbham said:
It's not just Nunes. There are multiple transcripts from witnesses other than the ICIG that were part of the impeachment inquiry that Schiff has chosen not to release. Why won't he put it all out there?
Click to expand...
What's your theory? Mine is they could potentially expose the whistleblower.
 
#33,186
#33,186
Mick said:
I bet you an impeachment , someone was a whistleblower. You can call him Elvis as far as I'm concerned.
Click to expand...

If he's such a big deal why didn't your first cousin Adam call him as a witness? Was his judgement not where it should be because he was sitting next to congressman farts-alot Swallwell to long?
 
#33,187
#33,187
Mick said:
What's your theory? Mine is they could potentially expose the whistleblower.
Click to expand...

redactions would easily take care of that. given how Schiff conducted things I'm generally positive that information harmful to the narrative resides in the transcripts he's held back.
 
#33,189
#33,189
vols40 said:
If he's such a big deal why didn't your first cousin Adam call him as a witness? Was his judgement not where it should be because he was sitting next to congressman farts-alot Swallwell to long?
Click to expand...
Oh hell, is it that time of night when all the drunks feel like trying to put though to words?
 
#33,194
#33,194
volinbham said:
redactions would easily take care of that. given how Schiff conducted things I'm generally positive that information harmful to the narrative resides in the transcripts he's held back.
Click to expand...
I think you're probably wrong and just wishful thinking.
 
#33,200
#33,200
Mick said:
Why not Trump?
Click to expand...

You can't just make accusations with no first
hand knowledge. If you do in court it's called hearsay. And defendants are not required to take the stand. Remember OJ? Don't believe he took the stand did he and that allowed him to be find not guilty. It's not on the president to prove his Innocence it's on the prosecutors in this case house Dems to prove his guilt to the tune of 67 senators votes for conviction.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top