The Impeachment Thread

#23,577
#23,577
luthervol said:
I'm 59 and I hope your memory isn't as bad a mine.
The July 21st prediction was always pretty much just a joke on my end.
Click to expand...

That last sentence I say is pure BS........you were very serious with that prediction of yours....you didn't joke at all about it at the time. You looked the fool in making comments you could not back up. Everybody here knows you are a clown and can't be taken seriously after that dumb blunder you made then. As you say......own it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: volinsd, Orange_Crush and volfanjustin
#23,578
#23,578
hUTch2002 said:
Speaking of conspiracy theories, disinformation, and extremism, did you see the hearings the last couple weeks that ended with no direct proof of any crimes committed by Trump? Good times.
Click to expand...
No, the hearings that I saw included compelling testimony from Gordon Sondland, Fiona Hill, Bill Taylor and David Holmes that showed evidence of a bribery scheme on the part of the Trump Administration. The information which Sondland testified to, was firsthand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ty4Vols, tvolsfan and Rifleman
#23,580
#23,580
BowlBrother85 said:
No, the hearings that I saw included compelling testimony from Gordon Sondland, Fiona Hill, Bill Taylor and David Holmes that showed evidence of a bribery scheme on the part of the Trump Administration. The information which Sondland testified to, was firsthand.
Click to expand...
You mean the ones where they all said they never saw or heard a quid pro quo or the word of the week "bribery"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#23,584
#23,584
volfanjustin said:
You mean the ones where they all said they never saw or heard a quid pro quo or the word of the week "bribery"?
Click to expand...
That is not what Sondland said at all. In fact, in his opening statement, Sondland testified that it was his understanding that there was a quid-pro-quo... and no, you don't have to hear the exact phrase "quid-pro-quo" uttered to reach an understanding, that is what has been inferred. Nobody says, "Hey Bob! I have a quid-pro-quo for you!"
 
#23,585
#23,585
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not what Sondland said at all. In fact, in his opening statement, Sondland testified that it was his understanding that there was a quid-pro-quo... and no, you don't have to hear the exact phrase "quid-pro-quo" uttered to reach an understanding, that is what has been inferred. Nobody says, "Hey Bob! I have a quid-pro-quo for you!"
Click to expand...

You must have watched the CNN version where they say what you say.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
#23,586
#23,586
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not what Sondland said at all. In fact, in his opening statement, Sondland testified that it was his understanding that there was a quid-pro-quo... and no, you don't have to hear the exact phrase "quid-pro-quo" uttered to reach an understanding, that is what has been inferred. Nobody says, "Hey Bob! I have a quid-pro-quo for you!"
Click to expand...
Again you must have stopped listening after your bug eyed hero ran to the cameras, when pressed he said no quid pro quo. Every single one of the witnesses who were all called by the far left said no quid pro quo and no bribery. Time to move on the the next hoax
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
#23,589
#23,589
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not what Sondland said at all. In fact, in his opening statement, Sondland testified that it was his understanding that there was a quid-pro-quo... and no, you don't have to hear the exact phrase "quid-pro-quo" uttered to reach an understanding, that is what has been inferred. Nobody says, "Hey Bob! I have a quid-pro-quo for you!"
Click to expand...
BowlBrother85 said:
That is not what Sondland said at all. In fact, in his opening statement, Sondland testified that it was his understanding that there was a quid-pro-quo... and no, you don't have to hear the exact phrase "quid-pro-quo" uttered to reach an understanding, that is what has been inferred. Nobody says, "Hey Bob! I have a quid-pro-quo for you!"
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood and volfanjustin
#23,593
#23,593
Just cheated death again and landed at DFW. Sorry libs.

Did we finish reverse engineering the internet and it’s transfer methods and capacities yet?
 
#23,595
#23,595
NorthDallas40 said:
Just cheated death again and landed at DFW. Sorry libs.

Did we finish reverse engineering the internet and it’s transfer methods and capacities yet?
Click to expand...


cache.php
 
  • Like
Reactions: NurseGoodVol and NorthDallas40
#23,596
#23,596
Orange_Crush said:
The reason that screenshot was a big deal is because Google was showing possibilities in broadband technologies at the time as opposed to realities.

@DinkinFlicka is posting a lot of wisdom here. There are actually better ways to try to debunk this than the way Rifle is going about it.
Click to expand...
But they don’t want to acknowledge what Dink is saying, that a local point to point transfer could have occurred and then a remote transfer occurred. Or multiple transfers occurred other than just local/remote even.
 
#23,600
#23,600
BowlBrother85 said:
No, the hearings that I saw included conflicting testimony from Gordon Sondland, Fiona Hill, Bill Taylor and David Holmes that showed evidence of a bribery scheme on the part of the Trump Administration. The information which Sondland testified to, was firsthand.
Click to expand...

Fixed.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top