The Impeachment Thread

#21,178
#21,178
luthervol said:
LOL....That's an admission of guilt.
Sonland testified that Trump was agitated and irritated (shocker) and just sort of blurted out...."I want nothing, nothing, no quid pro quo."

That's like him saying "I know nothing, nothing, I don't know Stormy Daniels?"
"I know nothing, nothing, nothing about any payoffs."
"I know nothing, nothing, nothing about any hotel meeting."
It's times like these that being a maniacal habitual liar comes back to haunt you. About damn time.
Click to expand...

I swear you have to be one of the stars on Mountain Monsters. Sitting here eating some Thai. That’s what’s on their tv. And my mind says that must be you.
 
#21,182
#21,182
If trump was innocent and Pompeo, Mulvaney, etc could clear him by testifying about a perfect call - now would be the perfect time to have them testify. To destroy the impeachment at its foundation and devastate the Dems. It would be a stroke of stable genius.

So, why would he not let them testify?
 
  • Like
Reactions: BenGrimm, luthervol and Hunerwadel
#21,186
#21,186
PeaceCorpsVol said:
If trump was innocent and Pompeo, Mulvaney, etc could clear him by testifying about a perfect call - now would be the perfect time to have them testify. To destroy the impeachment at its foundation and devastate the Dems. It would be a stroke of stable genius.

So, why would he not let them testify?
Click to expand...
Same reason the ''whistleblower'' won't testify.
 
#21,190
#21,190
Easy to see the Dems game..they try to get the talking points out with the opening statement the press friendlies run with it and it gets retweeted by the minions to set the daily narrative...and by the time it has to get retracted..like the AP Tweet did today it's hardly noticed
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol and SpaceCoastVol
#21,191
#21,191
PeaceCorpsVol said:
I am not the one going blackface with a noose around my neck next Halloween. Should I quote you or do you want to try to studded around why you said that?
Click to expand...
Nah that's OK Nancy, because you would still be defending the racist Jesse Smolette like the racist imbecile you are.

Carry on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hjeagle1vol and Obsessed
#21,198
#21,198
luthervol said:
I believe we are to the point where any reasonable person knows that Trump attempted to leverage the aid as a way to force Ukraine to openly state that they were investigating Burisma and possible 2016 election interference.
Click to expand...

But technically isn’t that exactly what VP Biden did in 2015? He said no money if you don’t fire Shokin. No money if you don’t uphold your obligation to investigate corruption.

I think it’s a very important distinction if money was being withheld looking into 2016 election interference (would we have released money to Russia?) vs whether he was specifically investigating Joe Biden. When you read the transcript, he asks specifically about 2016 election meddling. He then asked to see if there was any interference by the VP of an investigation into the VP son’s business dealings. I honestly don’t think it happened, but I don’t think that the question is unfair either.
 
#21,199
#21,199
I wonder if the GOP members realize nothing they ask now will matter. The talking points have been written. The pundits, on both sides, already know how they will frame today.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top