2020 Presidential Race

#19,201
#19,201
VolStrom said:
You're pretty prolific then, white spawning has sunk to a new low of 1.6 kids per family in the US.
Click to expand...
I've been extrapolating data for 40 years. Interesting to see people's reactions because there has certainly been little to no pro-action.
 
#19,205
#19,205
C-south said:
They’d rather waste billions than call it what it is....mental illness.
Click to expand...
They also used to think lobotomies and prescribing methamphetamines was a good idea. Science and medicine progresses, regardless of your incorrect opinions and outdated, foolish thinking. But, it is your right. So, carry on with your obvious disdain for people different than your narrow world view.
 
#19,206
#19,206
zeppelin128 said:
They also used to think lobotomies and prescribing methamphetamines was a good idea. Science and medicine progresses, regardless of your incorrect opinions and outdated, foolish thinking. But, it is your right. So, carry on with your obvious disdain for people different than your narrow world view.
Click to expand...

We also know what science says about gender and how many genders there are, do you prescribe to science on this topic or are you like the majority of liberals today who pretend that there “are no genders” or “numerous” genders?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Franklin Pierce
#19,207
#19,207
zeppelin128 said:
They also used to think lobotomies and prescribing methamphetamines was a good idea. Science and medicine progresses, regardless of your incorrect opinions and outdated, foolish thinking. But, it is your right. So, carry on with your obvious disdain for people different than your narrow world view.
Click to expand...
So, if they have been wrong in the past, they could be wrong about any number of unprovable things now, right?
 
#19,208
#19,208
615vols said:
We also know what science says about gender and how many genders there are, do you prescribe to science on this topic or are you like the majority of liberals today who pretend that there “are no genders” or “numerous” genders?
Click to expand...
As far as gender concerning anatomy and biology, there are two (the gender binary).

When it comes to how someone identifies their own gender, there is a spectrum.
 
#19,213
#19,213
1972 Grad said:
Right. Being a Presbyterian and identifying as a Baptist is exactly the same as looking down in your pants, seeing a penis, and calling yourself a girl.
Click to expand...
I know you can't answer but I'll ask.
Do you believe all females are equally female and all males are equally male?
I'll give you a hint, the earth is not flat.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
#19,216
#19,216
zeppelin128 said:
No it isn't. People identify as all sorts of different things. Religion, politics, sports fans, etc. That doesn't make one mentally ill.
Click to expand...

You are equating being a fan of a certain team to a person born a male saying he’s not really male but female? That’s a laughable comparison and nowhere close to being similar. It’s delusion/fantasy and holds as much weight as a person identifying as a giraffe. You can say you are this or that as much as you want, doesn’t make it true. You guys like science when it’s convenient, but ignore it on this subject. Let me help you, you are born male or female. No in between. That’s science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN-POSSUM, W.TN.Orange Blood and C-south
#19,217
#19,217
zeppelin128 said:
As far as gender concerning anatomy and biology, there are two (the gender binary).

When it comes to how someone identifies their own gender, there is a spectrum.
Click to expand...

There’s no f****** spectrum. Aside from a physical birth defect there are TWO. Anything else is a mental illness. That’s not being bigoted, narrow minded, or anything else just the damn facts. Choosing your own gender....lol... how f****** dumb is that? That’s nothing but a dim/lib made up philosophy to keep from hurting someone’s feelings by telling them there’s a screw loose somewhere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood, 615vols and Obsessed
#19,218
#19,218
615vols said:
You are equating being a fan of a certain team to a person born a male saying he’s not really male but female? That’s a laughable comparison and nowhere close to being similar. It’s delusion/fantasy and holds as much weight as a person identifying as a giraffe. You can say you are this or that as much as you want, doesn’t make it true. You guys like science when it’s convenient, but ignore it on this subject. Let me help you, you are born male or female. No in between. That’s science.
Click to expand...
Stop Using Phony Science to Justify Transphobia
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128
#19,220
#19,220
luthervol said:
Stop Using Phony Science to Justify Transphobia
Click to expand...
It is pointless really to attempt to discuss this issue on the board. There is far too much anger and disdain from the Right concerning this issue to have a civil conversation about it. I usually try to avoid it but took the bait earlier. I should know better.

Good article from Scientific American though. You also made good points, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
#19,221
#19,221
zeppelin128 said:
The campaign did respond, this morning:

-One stock photo of a Kenyan mother and kid was used on the website. It was removed shortly afterwards.
-The Intercept's (original source of the story) claim of "42% white supporters in the letter" is not proven. The Intercept even stated in the article that it was their "belief". Not exactly a solid claim. Not that it should matter anyways, white people support Pete's Douglass plan, too.
-Some of the people in the letter circulated supported the plan, but haven't endorsed Pete. Many said it gave the appearance of an endorsement. That is a fair and valid critique of the campaign.

I don't think anything nefarious was going on, just seemed amateurish to me. But it isn't the best look for the SC for Pete campaign group. Lis will get it sorted out.

Ninja Edit: Also, the tweet is intentionally misleading by leaving out some key details.

The source article was worse, and a blatant attack piece against Pete. This is how it will be from here on out, I get that. It is a good thing in a way; they view Pete as a legitimate threat. Otherwise they wouldn't be performing such mental gymnastics to go after him. Just what happens when a candidate has a nine point lead in the gold standard of Iowa polls released last night.
Click to expand...
This is a brutal error zep, I never thought he had a chance to begin with but this may for sure end him and will also he used in the future against him.
 
#19,222
#19,222
volfanjustin said:
This is a brutal error zep, I never thought he had a chance to begin with but this may for sure end him and will also he used in the future against him.
Click to expand...
We'll see if it stays in the news cycle. It is also only three people lodging the complaint, not 400.
It was definitely a mistake. I don't think it is a brutal one though. We'll see.
 
#19,224
#19,224
zeppelin128 said:
We'll see if it stays in the news cycle. It is also only three people lodging the complaint, not 400.
It was definitely a mistake. I don't think it is a brutal one though. We'll see.
Click to expand...
Seeing he’s a dem, won’t stay in the news cycle long. We all know how that goes
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top