SLICKYINC
Beef n cheddar
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 22,535
- Likes
- 82,433
All this is absolutely true. JG has been bad and I’m not defending him.all things considered, those are pretty good odds....lol....
the most frustrating thing about this whole deal at QB is that JG at no time gave these coaches any indication that his performance would be as bas as it's been so far this season.
and if he would have just performed at a serviceable level, we'd be 3-1 or better right now.......despite any/all coaching malpractice that anyone believes that has happened, at the end of the day, i dont' think anyone really dismisses that notion.
you should be able to count on a RS jr that has done everything you've wanted him to in the off season....
All this is absolutely true. JG has been bad and I’m not defending him.
BUT, there are ways to scheme around a bad QB and still beat BYU and Georgia State. We were woefully unprepared Week 1 and we collapsed in on ourselves in Week 2. Both of those things are coaching issues.
But moving forward, either you get JG in a position/system he can perform in or you throw Maurer and Shrout out there. Neither option is good. Neither option likely makes a difference until November. But that’s where we are right now.
Being 3-1 gets you through the tough October we all knew was coming. Being 1-3 might make this October a death sentence for this team’s buy in, accountability, effort, and honestly, just the ability to go out and have fun.
After watching this play from Sky cam. This looks to me like more of a miscommunication than a bad throw. I think we are running a levels concept where i think it’s DWA running a drag in front of Jennings on the inside and Palmer running a deeper in on the outside to occupy or make that Safety pick. Jennings makes a great move against outside leverage to get inside. I think JG thought (or at least the throw placement appeared like it) he was supposed to keep dragging across the middle but Jennings sat down once he beat his man.
View attachment 229274
meh. ...a lot of coaches would go with the experienced QB....considering your options behind him....
this conversation about the QB is almost a non starter for me cause i just don't think there are any real good options. wanna go with experience, fine, make sense. wanna go with the young guy and see what energy he brings, if he can make plays or affect people around him, fine, makes sense.
i don't think it matters one way or the other in this game. i think we'll see at least 2 qb's play no matter who trots out there to take the first snap.
Week 1 - JG threw 40 passes and had 10 rushing attempts that were basically pass calls that turned into tucks. So we basically called 50 or so pass plays. The RBs had 21 attempts. (Chandler 6)All this is absolutely true. JG has been bad and I’m not defending him.
BUT, there are ways to scheme around a bad QB and still beat BYU and Georgia State. We were woefully unprepared Week 1 and we collapsed in on ourselves in Week 2. Both of those things are coaching issues.
But moving forward, either you get JG in a position/system he can perform in or you throw Maurer and Shrout out there. Neither option is good. Neither option likely makes a difference until November. But that’s where we are right now.
Being 3-1 gets you through the tough October we all knew was coming. Being 1-3 might make this October a death sentence for this team’s buy in, accountability, effort, and honestly, just the ability to go out and have fun.