2020 Presidential Race

#5,154
#5,154
VolStrom said:
“My gaydar doesn’t even work that well in the present, let alone retroactively, but one can only assume that’s the case,”
I got news for him. 95% of the country doesn't have "gaydar" and equally 95% of the country doesn't want a gay man as President.
Click to expand...
I bet 50-60% of the country doesn't care.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wafflestomper, zeppelin128, LouderVol and 2 others
#5,157
#5,157
Last edited:
#5,161
#5,161
VolStrom said:
“My gaydar doesn’t even work that well in the present, let alone retroactively, but one can only assume that’s the case,”
I got news for him. 95% of the country doesn't have "gaydar" and equally 95% of the country doesn't want a gay man as President.
Click to expand...
That is definitely too high of a number. I don't think it is much of an issue outside the southeast and southwest regions or for people under the age of 30... but I would agree that it is still too much of an issue for a gay to be elected President or to even get the nomination of a major party.
 
#5,166
#5,166
1972 Grad said:
I keep telling everybody here. Biden won't be the nominee.
Click to expand...

It's not uncommon for people to cross lines and say they want a certain person in the opposing party to run. Any number of us here would suggest that Bernie or an AOC-like creature be the Dim candidate because we know people in the middle are unlikely to support them. It just doesn't mean anything now, and maybe not ever. Propaganda and useless "fact" from the people being polled (poled if you are a Dim).
 
  • Like
Reactions: RavinDave
#5,168
#5,168
AM64 said:
It's not uncommon for people to cross lines and say they want a certain person in the opposing party to run. Any number of us here would suggest that Bernie or an AOC-like creature be the Dim candidate because we know people in the middle are unlikely to support them. It just doesn't mean anything now, and maybe not ever. Propaganda and useless "fact" from the people being polled (poled if you are a Dim).
Click to expand...
The Democratic Nomination process is fixed with Super Delegates and I think Crazy Joe has pretty much has it already wrapped up like Hillary did in 2015-early 2016.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,169
#5,169
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump ran against the worst Democratic candidate possible four years ago... and he still only won 46.2% of the vote. He isn't "shredding" anybody.
Click to expand...
You're calling the holy grail Hillary the worst candidate?

I don't care about numbers. He will shred Bernie, the fk up, one on one debating. Period.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
#5,172
#5,172
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols, 1972 Grad and AM64
#5,173
#5,173
tvolsfan said:
It counts for more if they live in less populous states.
Click to expand...
votes only count for anything if you live in a swing state. Republican in Cali? Vote means nothing. Democrat in North Dakota, vote means nothing. PA/NC/FL/etc, suddenly your votes means a whole heck of a lot.

democracy is based on a system that states up to 49.9999% of the votes don't matter.
 
#5,175
#5,175
BowlBrother85 said:
Trump ran against the worst Democratic candidate possible four years ago... and he still only won 46.2% of the vote. He isn't "shredding" anybody.
Click to expand...
incumbent who has come out of "the biggest scandal ever" pretty much scott free at this point, with a decent economy, going against a divided party. i hope he is voted out, but unless something actually happens it doesn't look like it will happen
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top