Ernest T. Vol
It's me...Ernest T.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2013
- Messages
- 11,403
- Likes
- 21,969
The wheel didn't get broke and everyone sitting there knew there was no political capital in supporting Jon at that point.One thing I don't really understand, when the council is gathered and faced with choosing a king, why didn't Sam suggest his "best friend" the rightful heir to the throne? I doubt Grey Worm would have went along, but it seemed out of character for Sam, IMO.
There was some good moments but it could have been so much better. The showrunners know that too.I have to say...despite all my anger at how this went down since The Long Night episode..to be fair I have to admit..the Jon and Tyrion scene after he was imprisoned was extremely powerful and beautifully written...there...I said it.
It if you think about it, he WAS saying Jon. He was asking for a popular vote for the most natural leader, and that would have been Jon.I still thought it would have been very in character for Sam to say Jon. Jon was constantly having leadership thrust upon him. In that moment, it seemed wrong to me for them not to mention Jon as the rightful heir.
Well there were a lot of gaps. A several week time jump before tyrian is brought before that council... Nothing on varys's letters... No immediate action seen about Jon after he killed Dany... No time spent on assembling that council or their reaction to what happened in KL...Something just felt "off" about the whole episode, I'm not sure what it was. I'll have to watch it again in a few days.