615vols
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2012
- Messages
- 5,152
- Likes
- 9,068
I say we blame the USDA, who paid for all the "soy makes you gay" studies. They also bagged on soy milk because soy milk doesn't have vitamin D in it...while cow's milk doesn't either; it's added as a supplement.Someone put a lot of thought into that slight. Sounds like a more pc way to call someone a "fa*."
I say we blame the USDA, who paid for all the "soy makes you gay" studies. They also bagged on soy milk because soy milk doesn't have vitamin D in it...while cow's milk doesn't either; it's added as a supplement.
Your junk will fall off one night with no warning, as will your wife's breasts. Sorry. It's irreversible and unstoppable by this point.I need to know if there are any Almond milk studies that would suggest detrimental effects. My wife is making the fam drink it, my kids refuse and eat their cereal dry - but it's growing on me.
I am totally ok with that if you will just be honest and admit that abortion was legalized by the Democrats on the Supreme Court as a way to offset the no longer standing Jim Crowe laws so your racist party could keep killing the African American party off and make sure your power held strong.
Let’s not even debate the fact your party started the KKK. let’s just use RBG own words when she went ON RECORD and admitted she passed Rowe vs wade to keep the unwanted minority population down.
So of course u want abortion to continue under the guise of woman’s rights as you slaughter millions of black babies.
That's some mighty fine wiggling.. Not really.Look colluther what’s happening here is the same argument that the quote generated and has been going on for 10 years.
NEO made reference to “the quote” without stating it. You replied “she said no such thing” and either A) knew the quote and were just going thru the whole diatribe again or B) blindly made a dumb statement not knowing she indeed had a major foot it mouth incident 10 years ago and provided the pro lifers with a rallying cry.
I provided “the quote” verbatim. Here we are X pages later. And I’m gonna go with B above based on your whole “link” crap and then just ignoring my look it up. I gave you more credit on knowing the actual history of this topic than you deserved. My bad![]()
Yawn...That's some mighty fine wiggling.. Not really.
You are asserting that her quote supports what Neocon is claiming: That RBG is on record in her own words claiming that SHE PASSED Rowe vs Wade to keep the unwanted minority population down.
If that's not what you are asserting, then my claim that she said no such thing would be correct.
It has to be one or the other, does her quote mean what Neocon claims, or am I correct in stating that she said no such thing?
Sorry to all of the posters having to skim through all of this nonsense.
That's some mighty fine wiggling.. Not really.
You are asserting that her quote supports what Neocon is claiming: That RBG is on record in her own words claiming that SHE PASSED Rowe vs Wade to keep the unwanted minority population down.
If that's not what you are asserting, then my claim that she said no such thing would be correct.
It has to be one or the other, does her quote mean what Neocon claims, or am I correct in stating that she said no such thing?
Sorry to all of the posters having to skim through all of this nonsense.
Wise words. Heeded.Whats going on here is ND40 and a bunch of posters had a circle jerk about some 10 year old out of context RBG quote, got called on the inaccuracy and impressive stupidity of it, and now want to muddy the water and turn us around in circles instead of admitting it. The backtracking gymnastics have been a site to behold.
Luther...I don't agree with much of what you post on this board, but you got this one right. My suggestion is to just drop it. It's all right here in the thread and quoted multiple times. Any fair minded person above a 8th grade reading comprehension level can see whats going on.
I need you to point out where I specifically endorsed this argument. You’ve already claimed I was being dishonest and frankly I don’t think you proved your point.Whats going on here is ND40 and a bunch of posters had a circle jerk about some 10 year old out of context RBG quote, got called on the inaccuracy and impressive stupidity of it, and now want to muddy the water and turn us around in circles instead of admitting it. The backtracking gymnastics have been a site to behold.
Luther...I don't agree with much of what you post on this board, but you got this one right. My suggestion is to just drop it. It's all right here in the thread and quoted multiple times. Any fair minded person above a 8th grade reading comprehension level can see whats going on.
I need you to point out where I specifically endorsed this argument. You’ve already claimed I was being dishonest and frankly I don’t think you proved your point.
In fact go back to the post where I specifically stated I respect RBG I just hate her politics.
What you want to disingenuously ignore is she stuck her foot in her mouth with a awkward answer and didn’t clarify until three years later after all the hubbub behind it and it was too late to really correct the record. That’s an irrefutable fact. If you want to screech at me over that situation fine. Just note I’ve not stated I thought she was fine with eugenics. Any inference you make on that is on you not me.
I need you to point out where I specifically endorsed this argument. You’ve already claimed I was being dishonest and frankly I don’t think you proved your point.
In fact go back to the post where I specifically stated I respect RBG I just hate her politics.
What you want to disingenuously ignore is she stuck her foot in her mouth with a awkward answer and didn’t clarify until three years later after all the hubbub behind it and it was too late to really correct the record. That’s an irrefutable fact. If you want to screech at me over that situation fine. Just note I’ve not stated I thought she was fine with eugenics. Any inference you make on that is on you not me.
They did no such thing and it’s been left hanging in the air for 10 years. It’s fairly accepted at this point that she was not tasked at the time of the statement to explain her personal views. And you continue to speak for her and backtrack this foot-in-mouth quote just like the rest of the libs have for 10 years.
Nope. It was rehashed ad nauseam for 3 years before the follow up and then she goes “oh no what I meant was...”. I was aware of the Slate article when I searched and read it. Doesn’t change my point one bit. A three year later follow question that should have been asked on the spot is too little too late.
Here is her quote.
“Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”
There was no follow up question during the interview on whether she supported eugenics or not. And it’s been parsed ever since.![]()
It’s been parsed for ten years by actual smart people, you know not you. But hey all we needed was you doing a snopes check and provide two bolded sentences and the world is set back on its axis!![]()
As usual loother did just that again and even provided bolded statements that aren’t correlated trying to rationalize it.
Every statement I made is factual. Ginsberg stated what I posted verbatim. No follow up was asked allowing her to clarify HER personal views. Conservatives have a very valid rallying cry in this statement. And libs are left doing what you’re doing now. Attempting to provide an answer for Ginsburg that she herself never did at the moment of the statement being made.
Colluthers ass is the source of most of his “data”