zeppelin128
Possibly a llama.
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2014
- Messages
- 23,616
- Likes
- 33,954
It's pretty crummy hermeneutics since it ignores immediate context where Paul is talking about both work and eating. The hermeneutics would see where Paul defined eating as "anyone's food" and work as "laboring and toiling". "Not idle" in vs 7. eating "anyone's food" (as opposed to the Lord's Supper) in vs 8... etc.It's not spin, it's accepted hermeneutics.
You would be better served to state what Barr actually said. He said that Mueller's report did not exonerate the President of obstruction of justice but that there wasn't sufficient evidence to pursue obstruction of justice charges against anyone either. He left the question of obstruction of justice open ended... but it does seem to answer the question of conspiracy/collusion and I'm fine with that. Glad it's over.No collusion or conspiracy to collude with the Russians and no obstruction of justice.
Womp womp womp.