volatil
Villains
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2009
- Messages
- 42,084
- Likes
- 100,405
That conversation never should have been there, but it effectively ended when he had nothing in the finals. And now he’s embarrassing himself every game. He’s not Jordan, never has been. It’s laughable to even compare the twoAnyone who says Lebron is better than Jordan,I ask them where they think Jordan would be ranked in the NBA stat sheet if Jordan didn’t go to college or retireI get **Crickets
**.....Lebron isn’t even close to Jordan anymore.
That conversation never should have been there, but it effectively ended when he had nothing in the finals. And now he’s embarrassing himself every game. He’s not Jordan, never has been. It’s laughable to even compare the two
I agree. Doesn’t fit to me either. I bet the Zodiac is some dude no one has ever heard of. He’s dead already I’m sure and we’ll never know who he was. Stinks
Skirting the line with this post so I promise I’ll just leave it at this, but if you enjoy a good Ted Cruz meme, Bass, you’ll probably enjoy this silly website.Lol!
Gut feeling, he died back then.I agree. Doesn’t fit to me either. I bet the Zodiac is some dude no one has ever heard of. He’s dead already I’m sure and we’ll never know who he was. Stinks
Gut feeling, he died back then.
Despite intelligence, 2 common themes amongst serials
1. Extremely rare to just stop, too much compulsion.
2. They don't give the media any mystery or contact unless they want credit eventually, even if after death.
Maybe some mundane exit, accident, choked on deli sandwich etc.. Possibly left written clues but family member gathered material objects and trashed papers as junk.
Good lort, I really need to sleep more.
Forgot about GSK but that moves it up to 2 out of the 20 or so that I had in my head. I don't care about semantics so read it as "less common" if need be.1) Not true of the Golden State Killer, nor BTK. Serial killers, unfound after a long period, actually seem to show quite the penchant for suddenly stopping. Zodiac, unlike, say GSK, didn't have a sexual component either. It's unclear how compulsive or necessary it was for the person.
Fwiw they went back and have done further DNA analysis as recent as last year. With the continuing advancements in DNA and familial connections, we may have an answer evenyually, just as in GSK's case.
Also - interestingly in neither the GSK or BTK cases was the actual offender ever on anyone's list. There's a reason they got away for so long, they were never even suspects.
