Orange_Vol1321
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2012
- Messages
- 28,250
- Likes
- 42,465
Trying to badmouth the only Republican News TV station while not mentioning the 20 that are a 100 times worth that get their talking points faxed from Pelosi is laughable.
It might not be "her" but it is the Democratic talking points completely. If you record all the left stations on any given night, you could basically loop them together. The host would change, the message wouldn't.Except that this isn't true. They may be ideologically in step with Pelosi our other Democrats on certain issues, but they don't actually get their talking points from her.
Lol... keep telling yourself that. Absolutely clueless
Fox News ratings directly indicate the level of viewership of the debate. To try and state otherwise is idiocy.
This only holds to the extent that there are households that get Fox News but not CNN, MSNBC, or whoever else might show the debates.
Otherwise, it's quite simple for anyone who wants to watch the debate to flip to the channel showing the debate.
I really don't care one way or another if there's a debate on FNC, but these concern-trolling posts are silly.
If it wasn't so scary that people believe this it would be funny as hell.Good. Fox has largely ceased to be a news organization and are now, essentially, state media, as noted in the New Yorker article. Political bias/perspective is endemic in journalism, always has been. Fox, CNN, NBC, etc. have all had their slants, but they were apparent and still capable of asking questions of candidates from both sides. The way Fox, though, has ingratiated itself with this White House, having its members make daily conference calls and meetings with the president, helping formulate policy while then having a nightly show to comment on those policies is crossing a line.
You really are like those UT fans that know nothing but the 90's. Have you only been alive for 2 years?Except that it's true. The way the Fox News media has become part of the policy making, or discussing, team is completely unprecedented and the closest to state run, or influenced, media we've ever had. I will amend my "good" with a notation for one of the few objective journalists at Fox to moderate a debate, like Shepherd Smith or Chris Wallace, especially since it probably would be Wallace doing it.
Actually, it will be an absolute clown show.Poor little crybabies. The Dims want nothing but total control over everything in your daily lives & Fox want let them so they cry & cry by showing more & more sour grapes. What losers the Dims are.
Those debates will be nothing but boring TV anyway & viewers will laugh at the weak Dim clowns on stage.
Are a lot of Democratic voters regular Fox viewers?
This thread gets at the underlying issue here: Would the network moderators ask questions about stuff primary voters care about?
To be honest, I still think they should consider it. Reach as many as you can.Good. Fox has largely ceased to be a news organization and are now, essentially, state media, as noted in the New Yorker article. Political bias/perspective is endemic in journalism, always has been. Fox, CNN, NBC, etc. have all had their slants, but they were apparent and still capable of asking questions of candidates from both sides. The way Fox, though, has ingratiated itself with this White House, having its members make daily conference calls and meetings with the president, helping formulate policy while then having a nightly show to comment on those policies is crossing a line.
At some point the Dem. Primary winner will be campaigning for the office of president.That is funny? You must do stand up: "A Democrat goes on Fox and appeals to a viewer." cha-cha-bang