TrumPutinGate

Sure thing. Only two. Dig a bit deeper on the web. They’re not the stone cold factual news source you hope they’re viewed as liberal and fast and loose with their sources, in fact sourcing themselves at times. There’s a reason everybody and I mean everybody is hedging their reposts of the original story before fapping on what it could mean.

And then theirs the whole credibility story of their old parent company Gawker 😏
 
  • Like
Reactions: volfanjustin
The head in the sand attitude is really depressing. I have no faith in this nation's people as a whole when I know how many like this are out there voting.
Funny because I said the same about you all when you voted twice for the anti-American barrack hussein
 
Sure thing. Only two. Dig a bit deeper on the web. They’re not the stone cold factual news source you hope they’re viewed as liberal and fast and loose with their sources, in fact sourcing themselves at times. There’s a reason everybody and I mean everybody is hedging their reposts of the original story before fapping on what it could mean.

And then theirs the whole credibility story of their old parent company Gawker 😏
So far you are batting .000 on your assertion.
 
If Trump told Cohen to lie to Congress, I would support his removal from office.

There better damn well be some solid evidence of this however.
 
would be best to just ignore it, not really a big deal



200w.gif
 
Are you genuinely concerned that this is fake news or just screeching that it is.
I’m not concerned one way or the other. Until somebody with direct knowledge makes a public statement on the record corroborating the claims this is just another useless hearsay piece... in a very long line of hearsay pieces.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
I’m not concerned one way or the other. Until somebody with direct knowledge makes a public statement on the record corroborating the claims this is just another useless hearsay piece... in a very long line of hearsay pieces.
Come on ND, you know it is almost assuredly true. Keep grasping that lifeline, it's about to slip out of your hands.
 
there's a difference between should he be removed if this particular charge is proven true and will he be if this particular charge is proven true.

On the should side this particular charge alone is not sufficient just as Clinton's perjury alone was not. Most of the rationales I see here are including other charges.

I cannot predict the "would" side.

Somewhere in here, I explained my feels that Clinton not being removed is how we got into this mess.

(Ironically Charlie Sykes had a podcast a few days ago talking about the direct line between Newt Gingrich in the late 80s to Clinton in the late 90s to our present political climate. Not sure Sykes is a tremendous authority on much, but I always feel mildly affirmed knowing that other people have independently reached the same conclusion that I did.)

Maybe it’s time to correct that mistake.
 
Advertisement

Back
Top