appyvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2012
- Messages
- 5,077
- Likes
- 6,185
They had 3 timeouts and the two minute warning in their pocket down 8. If they were going to win, the defense was going to have to step up at some point. Since the NFL changed the rules, an already low percentage play became even more so. Field position was important...why give them the ball around midfield when if you made a stop you get the ball back in decent field position with time left and timeouts available? Not stupid at all.Siap but has anyone discussed why the cowboys didnt onside kick at after their last score? How stupid was that?
I never said effective. Making that unit effective would definitely be asking too much. Too small and not strong enough.
Bet being effective and not blowing assignments aren’t exactly the same thing. You don’t have to be big or strong to know your assignment and not let a defender through untouched. Even our guys like Smith (who definitely wasn’t lacking in the size/strength department) struggled with just knowing who to block a way too often.
Lolol Sab!View attachment 188811 i don’t know who this guy knows that’s a insider but since I started following him on twitter, he seems to be pretty accurate
I disagree. If you are going to kick it deep, at least pooch it into the void between the deep man and the 10 up front. You might just beat them to it.
View attachment 188811 i don’t know who this guy knows that’s a insider but since I started following him on twitter, he seems to be pretty accurate
I dont think field position mattered much at that point.They had 3 timeouts and the two minute warning in their pocket down 8. If they were going to win, the defense was going to have to step up at some point. Since the NFL changed the rules, an already low percentage play became even more so. Field position was important...why give them the ball around midfield when if you made a stop you get the ball back in decent field position with time left and timeouts available? Not stupid at all.