Darth_Shiveman
Probably Being Facetious
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2012
- Messages
- 11,981
- Likes
- 9,727
Not upset, working on trying to get my life insurance upped for my family, so this board is a side distraction a.t.m. No triggering just no concentration on tact or diplomacy.
Cutting off a conversation with “k” multiple times, returning to edit a post that just said “k” with a verbal jab, then sarcastically apologizing for being triggered seems to suggest otherwise, but whatever.
So you are starting from the premise that his recruiting would be bad and that evidence is needed to refute that?My post "nothing to suggest his class here" was in reference to the most extreme takes on Mullen's recruiting.
"Sad" was the absolute worst ever said about his recruiting and there's not even evidence to unequivocally PROVE that wrong given UF wins and talent.
Therefore, any attempt to "lol" people that simply thought it wouldn't be "good enough", is completely unjustified.
If so, that is a poor argument IMO. Not really any different from the one you were rebutting. When you make an assertion like that, the burden of evidence falls on you. But in this case there isn’t really evidence to make an assertion like that either way.
You can say “I think his recruiting here would have been poor because X” or “I think it would have been fine because Y.” However, saying “there is no proof that his recruiting wouldn’t have been poor” is a little disingenuous, IMO, because it puts the burden of proof on someone to prove something that is inherently unprovable.