NurseGoodVol
Middle…ish
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 14,645
- Likes
- 26,745
You are talking about mental illness as if there is an on off switch. We confiscating knives, bats, tire irons too? They are all weapons and just as deadly as a bullet.Its a different question. Of course it would be best to have a better handle on mental illness. That is true for all sorts of reasons.
But, more narrowly, when people have a chronic mental illness, or an episode as reported on this fellow where police are called and they send out a mental health counselor to see if he should be taken in, even if it is not so acute that he has to be taken into custody, I would hope we would all agree there should be a sweep of his home for firearms and they should be taken for safekeeping until it is demonstrated that he is not a threat.
As a young woman I was married to a schizophrenic with paranoic features. As long as he self medicated with pot he was ok. The minute you added stress and lack of being high he was dangerous. Enough to have a judge commit him for 90 days. When he got out he parroted everything they taught him that was acceptable to say to be released.
So the mental health “expert” that was qualified to say he’s ok to release into society was wrong. He held me captive with a boot knife after that. He never owned a gun but his boot knife could have done the job.
Even my psych teacher admitted it. As much as psychiatrists like to tout their expertise, their only choice is to throw drugs at a chemically imbalanced brain and hope they are manipulating the right neuroreceptors. There are certain conditions that will never be “cured”. There are certain people that will never be ok in society.
So who’s gonna decide who’s safe and who’s not? Family members? Police? The psych community? Heaven forbid they have an ex gf or bf with an axe to grind. This is the gap in the solution to mental health targeting.
Are we going to violate rights on the JIC principle?