Deficit up 17%

#326
#326
luthervol said:
lol......you're talking about less than .0001% of the populace. They're despicable people that should have their assistance cut off immediately. NO ONE advocates for continued support of the type of person you described. Yet still, their numbers are lower than those of the toothless redneck meth heads voting for Trump.
Click to expand...
It’s a much much higher percentage than that.
 
#329
#329
luthervol said:
I might go as high as .001%. Still less than the other category I referenced.
Click to expand...

Still a much higher percentage than that.... have you ever worked or lived around people using welfare? What have you done to offer assistance to these people?
 
#331
#331
luthervol said:
That is as true as this: It's not the schools, it's the dumb, lazy, unmotivated students who undervalue the importance of an education.
Click to expand...
and.......

they aren't the same, or even similar, issues. different causes, different "victims", different solutions, etc etc etc.
 
#334
#334
Orange_Crush said:
He turned around and listed meth heads as the people he wants to support. And he wonders why we laugh at his stupidity.
Click to expand...
Yeah I know it’s crazy and meth heads don’t use food stamps for food for their kids.... they sell them to get drugs.
 
#335
#335
volbeast33 said:
Still a much higher percentage than that.... have you ever worked or lived around people using welfare? What have you done to offer assistance to these people?
Click to expand...
lol.....yes, for a number of years. Dedicated my career.
 
#337
#337
Orange_Crush said:
He turned around and listed meth heads as the people he wants to support. And he wonders why we laugh at his stupidity.
Click to expand...

Again, you're clueless and mistaking your assumptions for facts. I never once listed meth heads as people I want to support, I listed the innocent children of meth heads. Slight difference, at least in the colorful 3-dimensional
world in which many of us reside.
 
#339
#339
luthervol said:
Again, you're clueless and mistaking your assumptions for facts. I never once listed meth heads as people I want to support, I listed the innocent children of meth heads. Slight difference, at least in the colorful 3-dimensional
world in which many of us reside.
Click to expand...

There is no difference. As heads of households, you are wanting to give meth heads money to support their households. Stop being disingenuous and trying to play word games as though we're stupid.

If you wanted to help/support the kids of known meth heads, it would be by taking them out of the meth home.

Again, you are transparent, and we aren't as dumb as you need us to be. Give it up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#340
#340
luthervol said:
Again, you're clueless and mistaking your assumptions for facts. I never once listed meth heads as people I want to support, I listed the innocent children of meth heads. Slight difference, at least in the colorful 3-dimensional
world in which many of us reside.
Click to expand...
You do know that the support goes to the parent and not the child right...
 
#341
#341
volbeast33 said:
You do know that the support goes to the parent and not the child right...
Click to expand...
He knows. It's luther luthering. He makes stupid arguments, is too proud to own them, and resorts to gaslighting.

You'd win a million dollars a week if you could get Vegas to give odds on how Luther's debates will end up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Carl Pickens
#342
#342
Orange_Crush said:
There is no difference. As heads of households, you are wanting to give meth heads money to support their households. Stop being disingenuous and trying to play word games as though we're stupid.

If you wanted to help/support the kids of known meth heads, it would be by taking them out of the meth home.

Again, you are transparent, and we aren't as dumb as you need us to be. Give it up.
Click to expand...
Taking them out of the home is exactly what I want and what will happen if the correct government programs are in place. No word games being played. The fact that you ASSUMED my comment was advocating support of the MOTHER and not the kids is proof that you lack reason and perspective (that allusive 3rd dimension.)
 
#343
#343
luthervol said:
Taking them out of the home is exactly what I want and what will happen if the correct government programs are in place. No word games being played. The fact that you ASSUMED my comment was advocating support of the MOTHER and not the kids is proof that you lack reason and perspective (that allusive 3rd dimension.)
Click to expand...
Luther being luther. lol
 
#347
#347
44249919_1900753436647008_3738022540082151424_n.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top