Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

#729
#729
Obsessed said:
On July 13th, 2018, an indictment was filed by Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III.

This author is responding to the indictment because it features claims about Guccifer 2.0 that are inconsistent with what has been discovered about the persona, including the following:

* - Evidence was found over 500 days ago relating to the Guccifer 2.0 persona that showed they had deliberately manipulated files to have Russian metadata. We know the process used to construct the documents was not due to accidental mistakes during the creation process.
* - The original template document that Guccifer 2.0 used has been identified. It is also the source of the presence of Warren Flood’s name, and can be found attached to one of Podesta’s emails (it has RSIDs matching with Guccifer 2.0’s first couple of documents).
* - The Trump opposition research, which CrowdStrike claimed was targeted at the DNC, apparently in late April 2016, isn’t what Guccifer 2.0 actually presented to reporters. It also didn’t come from the DNC, but was an attached file on one of John Podesta’s emails – not the DNC’s. This specific copy appears to have been edited by Tony Carrk shortly before it was sent to Podesta. The fact that Guccifer 2.0’s initial releases were Podesta email attachments was even conceded by a former DNC official.
* - It appears that Guccifer 2.0 fabricated evidence on June 15, 2016, that coincidentally dovetailed with multiple claims made by CrowdStrike executives that had been published the previous day.
* - Guccifer 2.0 went to considerable effort to make sure Russian error messages appeared in copies of files given to the press.
* - Evidence – which Guccifer 2.0 couldn’t manipulate due to being logged by third parties – suggests he was operating in the US.
* - Additional evidence, which Guccifer 2.0 would have been unlikely to realize “he” was leaving, indicated that the persona was archiving files in US timezones before release, with email headers giving him away early on.
* - Virtually everything that has been claimed to indicate Guccifer 2.0 was Russian was based on something he chose to do.
* - Considering that Guccifer 2.0 had access to Podesta’s emails, yet never leaked anything truly damaging to the Clinton campaign even though he would have had access to it, is highly suspicious. In fact, Guccifer 2.0 never referenced any of the scandals that would later explode when the DNC emails and Podesta email collections were published by WikiLeaks.
Click to expand...

Wait a minute. Meuller’s middle name is Swan? And not one clever person, unless I missed it, has made a Billy Madison reference.
 
#730
#730
LG now calling his Representative:

angry-phonecall.gif


Emailing his Senators:

angry-typing.gif


Reading VN:

angry-computer-guy.jpg


Seeing my previous post in pics:

why%20anger%20management%20is%20important_anchor_0.jpg


The rest of us at his elevated blood pressure:

giphy.gif


Freak trying to decide whether LG has totally lost it:

typing-funny-gif.gif


And Freak's reaction:

giphy.gif


The remainder of VN:

giphy.gif


And watching his meltdown:

ComplicatedActualArcticfox.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
#732
#732
LouderVol said:
lets me guess you would have preferred him to go WWE on Putin and broken a steel folding chair over Putin's back before declaring war and launching the nukes?

starting a pissing match up there on stage probably would have been the worst thing he could have done.
Click to expand...




No. But you are of course creating the ultimate straw man here.


The thing to have said in response was: "We have concluded that the evidence of meddling in our election process is overwhelming and undeniable. I appreciate that President Putin has committed to investigating the matter on his end. In the meantime, the US will take firm steps to preclude such tactics in the future and will take action against those who attempt to influence our elections."


That's all he had to say. He could decline to follow up on specifics in front of Putin. Come home, announce additional sanctions. Announce working with Congress and intelligence agencies to understand prior attacks and thwart future ones.


Be a whole lot better than "I believe the dictator/former KGB agent over our own agencies because it makes me look bad."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#733
#733
Callllmmmm down libs...Trump's in negotiation mode, he's not gonna throw egg and fire on Putin's face in front of the cameras today.

Trump gets daily intelligence briefing, he knows everything, there's no way he would discredit or misconstrue publically what intelligence tells him in his daily briefings.

Man o man...the unhinged rhetoric is funny.

Oh yeah, and no one knows what Trump said to Putin. Do they?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#734
#734
...and Trump doesn't see any reason why Russia would want to sow distrust and discord in the democratic electoral process of the United States? Do you really think he is that naive?

These last few pages just further demonstrate that some of you really would defend Trump for literally anything he said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#736
#736
Vol0725 said:
callllmmmm down libs

Trump gets daily intelligence briefing, he knows everything, there's no way he would discredit or misconstrue publically what intelligence tells him in his daily briefings.

Man o man...the unhinged rhetoric is funny.

Oh yeah, and no one knows what Trump said to Putin. Do they?
Click to expand...

From past reports, which have never been disputed, Trump doesn't even read his daily briefings! He has made it a practice to undermine and publicly attack the US intelligence community since he took office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#737
#737
BowlBrother85 said:
...and Trump doesn't see any reason why Russia would want to sow distrust and discord in the democratic electoral process of the United States? Do you really think he is that naive?

These last few pages just further demonstrate that some of you really would defend Trump for literally anything he said.
Click to expand...

Do you know what was said behind closed doors before, during and after the Summit?
 
#738
#738
BowlBrother85 said:
...and Trump doesn't see any reason why Russia would want to sow distrust and discord in the democratic electoral process of the United States? Do you really think he is that naive?

These last few pages just further demonstrate that some of you really would defend Trump for literally anything he said.
Click to expand...

Evidence suggests this is exactly what the libs wanted after that 2016 ass whipping.
 
#739
#739
Vol0725 said:
Do you know what was said behind closed doors before, during and after the Summit?
Click to expand...

Nobody does because, curiously, Trump insisted that none of his advisers or Pompeo would even be in the damn meeting. He only wanted himself, Putin and the interpreters. Why do you suppose he wanted as few witnesses as possible?
 
#741
#741
BB's apparently is present in the daily presidential intelligence briefings, or has an 'unnamed source' there, thus he's 100% fully qualified to pass swift judgement on the president.
 
#743
#743
Vol0725 said:
BB's apparently is present in the daily presidential intelligence briefings, or has an 'unnamed source' there, thus he's 100% fully qualified to pass swift judgement on the president.
Click to expand...

I'm not taking the time to link anything but there are many reports out there that Trump never reads the daily brief. Google "Trump's daily briefing" if you are so inclined.
 
#748
#748
BowlBrother85 said:
More whataboutism. It's all you have. And by the accounts I have read, Trump reads NONE of his daily briefings.
Click to expand...

"Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats told the Post that “any notion that President Trump is not fully engaged in the PDB or does not read the briefing materials is pure fiction and is clearly not based on firsthand knowledge of the process.”

He added that Trump "engages for significantly longer periods than I understand many previous presidents have done.”

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...report-to-reading-daily-intel-briefing-report
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top