Special counsel Mueller charges 12 Russian intelligence officers with hacking Democra

#51
#51
I’m gonna speculate this is the initial wrap up indictment list. This is gonna be the money shot that we paid all that taxpayer money for. They won’t get their hands on any of these people to apply pressure on in order to get more bread crumbs. This list meets the initial charter. Mueller gets his attaboy and rides off into the sunset.
 
#56
#56
landscapingvol said:
It does? Per Rod Rosenstein: “There is no allegation in this indictment that any US citizen committed a crime”. “It did not change any vote count or election outcome”.

You seem smart
Click to expand...

The correspondence in the indictment match those of Roger Stone. Also he admitted to having correspondence with both Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0. Also there is a congressman who got information from Guccifer and he’s not named in the indictment.
 

Attachments

  • A9CFA7DB-C979-4B4F-A472-AE0CAFA68107.jpg
    A9CFA7DB-C979-4B4F-A472-AE0CAFA68107.jpg
    55.9 KB · Views: 2
  • EC672238-DD33-4377-B2B5-4183AF3408CA.jpg
    EC672238-DD33-4377-B2B5-4183AF3408CA.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 0
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#58
#58
SLICKYINC said:
You on LGs pay role?
Click to expand...

The words used in a federal indictment are specific and deliberate.

Common sense should tell you that stating that "that" document contains no further implications or allegations should be taken at face value and not applied to an entire investigation or on future allegations.

The words used are specific to that document. I don't believe one has to have a law degree to extrapolate this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#61
#61
Septic said:
The words used in a federal indictment are specific and deliberate.

Common sense should tell you that stating that "that" document contains no further implications or allegations should be taken at face value and not applied to an entire investigation or on future allegations.

The words used are specific to that document. I don't believe one has to have a law degree to extrapolate this.
Click to expand...

Shirley has spoken. Trump will be taken away in handcuffs after engaging in butt sex with Putin. Amirite?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#62
#62
landscapingvol said:
To get Trump elected through well placed FB ads that hypnotically mind controlled white voters with words like “guns” and “God”. It was dastardly
Click to expand...

But. But. But. It didn’t work. She won the popular vote.
The electoral college wasn’t hacked.....

This is all a pr stunt. Libs are trying to please their base.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#63
#63
carlos86 said:
The correspondence in the indictment match those of Roger Stone. Also he admitted to having correspondence with both Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0. Also there is a congressman who got information from Guccifer and he’s not named in the indictment.
Click to expand...

That settles it, send Mueller home. It’s over Carlos and Twitter have solved it
 
#64
#64
landscapingvol said:
Shirley has spoken. Trump will be taken away in handcuffs after engaging in butt sex with Putin. Amirite?
Click to expand...

What are you talking about?

Is this another one of your misguided attempts at making points against an argument that doesn't exist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#65
#65
Septic said:
What are you talking about?

Is this another one of your misguided attempts at making points against an argument that doesn't exist?
Click to expand...

Exactly, what I think every time you post. Overtly vague and are supposed to be funny?! I tried to interpret it from your point of view as best I could but I don’t speak middle aged female so I struggle a bit. You and bowlbrother should consider getting a pedicure together since there is so much new gossip to discuss
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#66
#66
SLICKYINC said:
I think the timing is good. Trump will be briefed on it and hopefully sit back, think about it on his way to Muh Russia and light into Putin.
Click to expand...
I think he and Putin will probably have a good laugh about how incompetent the DNC and Hillary in particular were. You know... having a personal server at home while conducting official state business... Debbie WassermanSchultz leaving her laptops at God-knows-where. And then there's the Weiner dog...
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#67
#67
Septic said:
The words used in a federal indictment are specific and deliberate.

Common sense should tell you that stating that "that" document contains no further implications or allegations should be taken at face value and not applied to an entire investigation or on future allegations.

The words used are specific to that document. I don't believe one has to have a law degree to extrapolate this.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure the words were "this" indictment, not "that" indictment.

But you already knew that from your astute nature of keeping up with intricate details and double checking google to make sure there were no holes in your argument, just to find out it was all for nothing.

Little did you know that I am completely detached from these proceedings. I am 8 layers of irony deep and this whole thing is funny to me on a level you could never comprehend.

Troll on trollster. Troll on..
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#68
#68
My speculation is that Muellers next stage will be to indict Americans involved in the conspiracy.
 
#70
#70
NorthDallas40 said:
I’m gonna speculate this is the initial wrap up indictment list. This is gonna be the money shot that we paid all that taxpayer money for. They won’t get their hands on any of these people to apply pressure on in order to get more bread crumbs. This list meets the initial charter. Mueller gets his attaboy and rides off into the sunset.
Click to expand...

Question: do you act as if you know everything in all other aspects of your life?
 

Attachments

  • D787800D-A964-4462-8113-06C7F8650B6B.jpg
    D787800D-A964-4462-8113-06C7F8650B6B.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 3
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#73
#73
Matt2496 said:
My speculation is that Muellers next stage will be to indict Americans involved in the conspiracy.
Click to expand...

My speculation is that Mueller is throwing out meaningless indictments that will go nowhere but seem awesome. He has already indicted Manafort and Flynn on unrelated charges. He is doing nothing but fishing to see what he could catch. I thought an American President would need some substantial evidence against him before launching a year and a half investigation? Instead, we get an investigation trying to find evidence by the party who is bitter over losing the election
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
#74
#74
Sandman 423 said:
How do they know that these 12 did it? I would assume that it was some sort of cyber forensics.

Does this mean that one of the US spy agencies have access to the DNC servers?
Click to expand...

Spy vs spy - for anyone old enough to remember Mad magazine.

The hypocrisy is in blaming and going after someone else's spies for doing the same thing we are and have been doing. And you are right, how do we know they were spying if we weren't doing the same.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#75
#75
#VFL__ said:
Question: do you act as if you know everything in all other aspects of your life?
Click to expand...

We’ll Flynn and Manafort were prosecuted on unrelated charges and the other indictments were foreign nationals who will probably never see a courtroom
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement
Back
Top