FBI Trump-hater Strozk to testify publicly

#276
#276
BowlBrother85 said:
Peter Strzok co-wrote the initial draft of the Comey letter that re-opened the Clinton e-mail probe. This letter formed the basis of what Comey sent to Congress, supporting the reopening of the investigation once the e-mails were discovered on Weiner's laptop.

I can't provide a link but just Google "Strzok Drafted Comey Letter" and you will find links to both CNN and Fox News in the first two links.
Click to expand...

This has nothing to do with Comey's public statement, which is what ruined Hillary and you originally stated he supported. To make that public was Comey's decision, not Strzok's.
 
#277
#277
Septic said:
You don't engage me because you get tired of having to pull my foot out of your ass.

Old man.
Click to expand...

So you admit you like putting your foot up old men's asses! Sexual deviant.



Butt I'm not judging.
 
#278
#278
Weezer said:
The opinions of staunch Dems and GOPers will not be swayed. But most independents will read those texts and see the obvious bias they contain. I don't see how that helps Dems.
Click to expand...

Let's get clear on what we mean by bias. Is bias belief? Motivation? Action? If belief, then clearly strzok is biased. If motivation, we need a lot more context to determine, because actions can often have multiple motivations. Actions? IG looked at the actions Strzok took and couldn't find anything amiss.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#279
#279
Disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok said Thursday that his disparaging comments about “ignorant hillbilly” Trump supporters were not meant to disparage Trump supporters as ignorant hillbillies.
 
#281
#281
golfballs said:
I agree w this. If he’s cheating w Lisa Page I can’t imagine what his wife looks like...
[twitter]1007995918279413760[/twitter]
Click to expand...

Question: If Peter Strzok was so biased in his efforts to help Hillary Clinton defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election, why did he help draft the letter that James Comey sent to Congress announcing that the Clinton e-mail probe had been reopened following the discovery of e-mails on the Weiner laptop, just 9 days before the election?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#282
#282
Squints said:
Nope, I’ve tried several times to be amicable with you and you refused.

You want to act a punk, I will treat you as such. I don’t give a damn if we’re geographically similar in upbringing or not, you’re a socialist, **** talking mouth breather.

I have no respect for a kid who spins more than a record. If you don’t like that, STHU and keep stepping.

I used to pity kids like you; I now laugh.
Click to expand...

Not sure I ever recall you being amicable with me. I don't have any respect for you either, that is earned, which is the direct opposite of your responses.

But okay, let's try this. How about we both leave off the insults in the future in our interactions? Or just avoid each other altogether. I don't block people because it is good to be challenged by opposing beliefs.
 
#283
#283
evillawyer said:
Let's get clear on what we mean by bias. Is bias belief? Motivation? Action? If belief, then clearly strzok is biased. If motivation, we need a lot more context to determine, because actions can often have multiple motivations. Actions? IG looked at the actions Strzok took and couldn't find anything amiss.
Click to expand...

So you think the average American will read those texts and think nothing of them? I'm not buying that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#284
#284
DC_Vol said:
Suppose a judge was in the klan and he was presiding over the trial of a black man. During the trial, he sent messages to his paramour about how he despised the man on trial.

I'm sure you'd never accept his explanation that he never acted on his bias in his professional duties.
Click to expand...

Difference in political opinions does not equal overt racism.
 
#285
#285
Matt2496 said:
This has nothing to do with Comey's public statement, which is what ruined Hillary and you originally stated he supported. To make that public was Comey's decision, not Strzok's.
Click to expand...

Strzok co-wrote the letter to Congress. Of course, Strzok and Comey both knew that the Republicans in Congress who supported Trump would leak the letter to Fox News. Comey got out in front of it but so what? They both knew it would be made public anyway and it would have!
 
#286
#286
zeppelin128 said:
Not sure I ever recall you being amicable with me. I don't have any respect for you either, that is earned, which is the direct opposite of your responses.

But okay, let's try this. How about we both leave off the insults in the future in our interactions? Or just avoid each other altogether. I don't block people because it is good to be challenged by opposing beliefs.
Click to expand...

Whatever blows your skirt up.....
 
#287
#287
BowlBrother85 said:
Question: If Peter Strzok was so biased in his efforts to help Hillary Clinton defeat Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential election, why did he help draft the letter that James Comey sent to Congress announcing that the Clinton e-mail probe had been reopened following the discovery of e-mails on the Weiner laptop, just 9 days before the election?
Click to expand...

That's the old deep state misdirection move. You know, make sure the person you hate gets elected so you can later concoct a bogus investigation involving hundreds of people (who are all in on it) and create bogus evidence so you maybe, by chance, if you're really lucky, possibly get rid of the guy after he's served 3 years of his term.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#288
#288
Squints said:
I don’t give two damns about who was claiming what and when they claimed it, I’m talking about the dims eager sanctimoniousness to squeal like pigs over Trump (and others) but nothing but crickets when it comes to one of their own.

I heard Trump tagged Stormy X times in Y minutes, though.
Click to expand...

So you totally missed the point.

The x/y jokes were funny the first x times, but for the last y times, they've become increasingly trite.
 
#289
#289
evillawyer said:
Let's get clear on what we mean by bias. Is bias belief? Motivation? Action? If belief, then clearly strzok is biased. If motivation, we need a lot more context to determine, because actions can often have multiple motivations. Actions? IG looked at the actions Strzok took and couldn't find anything amiss.
Click to expand...

He's been under investigation for months and there is nothing. This entire hearing was Republican sideshow for ads when they run for reelection.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#290
#290
zeppelin128 said:
He's been under investigation for months and there is nothing. This entire hearing was Republican sideshow for ads when they run for reelection.
Click to expand...

Trump's been under investigation over a year, and there is nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#291
#291
Septic said:
You don't engage me because you get tired of having to pull my foot out of your ass.

Old man.
Click to expand...
Do you have any idea how a size 12 feels up your ass all the way to your belly button, when you're 68, and your lower back already hurts?
 
#295
#295
Weezer said:
So you think the average American will read those texts and think nothing of them? I'm not buying that.
Click to expand...

They're concerning, yes. But giving you reason for concern is not the same as showing a biased action or biased motivation for an otherwise valid action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#296
#296
evillawyer said:
That's the old deep state misdirection move. You know, make sure the person you hate gets elected so you can later concoct a bogus investigation involving hundreds of people (who are all in on it) and create bogus evidence so you maybe, by chance, if you're really lucky, possibly get rid of the guy after he's served 3 years of his term.
Click to expand...

It's hilarious. Strzok helped Trump get elected. You can't get around that fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#298
#298
Weezer said:
Trump's been under investigation over a year, and there is nothing.
Click to expand...

Strozk even said today that collusion wasn't against the law.

The whole damn reason this whole sh!t show started to begin with.

But he did finally give Jordan the name of the person who gave the FBI parts of the fake dossier.
 
#299
#299
Septic said:
Without going back through the last 13 pages, is it safe to assume that rational people all agree that the Strozk finally had his day and laid to rest that he is a boogeyman for the anti trump FBI?

Cause' from what I saw, he laid an epic verbal beatdown on jock sniffing trump window lickers.

Or are the knuckle draggers still entrenched in their cloak and dagger fantasy land where it's them against the world?

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLtmzdzCeRsyHbGTxOX4BZvSgXBh20n-_4&v=JRy8z5-CAE0[/youtube]

Gowdy's face at the end is priceless.
Click to expand...

Lurch looked like he was going to puke.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top