Wow they got these signs printed up really fast.
[twitter]1016492951747244033[/twitter]
"Kavanugh has stated that he considers Roe v. Wade binding under the principle of stare decisis and would seek to uphold it, but has also ruled in favor of some restrictions for abortion."
Yeah, the Democrats really shouldn't be that fired up about this pick. Of the 4, Kavanaugh is probably the least threatening. I'm betting that outside of just wanting to block for blocking sake, his involvement in the Starr investigation has them riled.
It will certainly slow down the inevitable. But the pace of progress has always been the only battle. I do hate the fact that there will be so much unnecessary collateral damage.
'72 - tried a few new places. DoDaddy's. Scallop Republic, and Crazy Fish.
The reason for my pity is that your prediction appears to be wrong at the moment. I worry about what they may do to your psyche, and how you will cope. Another silent protest in order, maybe?Don't pity me, I'm an upper middle class, heterosexual white guy. It's the masses not in that category who are of concern.
Plus, I think he will increase demand for jobs in my daughter's selected ares of study. (left handed complement)
Statism. That's his God and his utopia.What is this "inevitable" that you pronounce? "Inevitable" what?
What is ur utopia that you speaketh?
What in God's name do you not have now?
I honestly believe progressivism is a never ending, never achieved value that cannot ever be achieved by the very definition of itself.
What is utopia to u? Man's flawed nature will never allow.
I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on his suitability at this point, except that his 2009 writings on delaying civil and criminal cases while a president is in office should cause people to ask him to recuse himself should the issue arise as to Trump. If he declines to make that promise, he should not be confirmed. Period.
I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on his suitability at this point, except that his 2009 writings on delaying civil and criminal cases while a president is in office should cause people to ask him to recuse himself should the issue arise as to Trump. If he declines to make that promise, he should not be confirmed. Period.
Yeah, the Democrats really shouldn't be that fired up about this pick. Of the 4, Kavanaugh is probably the least threatening. I'm betting that outside of just wanting to block for blocking sake,his involvement in the Starr investigationTrump picking him has them riled.
I don't know enough about him to have an opinion on his suitability at this point, except that his 2009 writings on delaying civil and criminal cases while a president is in office should cause people to ask him to recuse himself should the issue arise as to Trump. If he declines to make that promise, he should not be confirmed. Period.