Keep it classy libs....

#351
#351
TennTom said:
From the story, seems they did go public with the local station, and then started getting threatened. Then they requested anonymity.
Click to expand...

Kind of like Maxine Waters received threats? She said something stupid and tried to play the sympathy card just like this guy. How do anonymous people receive threats?
 
#354
#354
Weezer said:
Let's pretend this is true. I wasn't there, so who knows. But even if true, does it justify a 30 year old assaulting a 16 year old? I'd say no.

Maybe the kid did spit out some abhorrent words. Whether or not you agree with someone's views, they are still aloud to speak them. You espouse the First Amendment often, so remember, free speech applies even when you don't like what's being said.

Still, no excuse for stealing the kid's hat and verbally assaulting him. Just admit the guy was wrong and stop trying to find justification because you won't find it.
Click to expand...


Move the goal posts much?

You guys did the feigned outrage gimmick over it being about the hat. Now you have to shift to it just want justified.

Sad!
 
#357
#357
lawgator1 said:
Move the goal posts much?

You guys did the feigned outrage gimmick over it being about the hat. Now you have to shift to it just want justified.

Sad!
Click to expand...

The hell we did. It isn’t ok for a 30 year old man to commit simple assault and theft against a 16 year old minor because he got his feelz hurt. Plain and simple.
 
#359
#359
TennTom said:
Of course it doesn't, but it might explain why this guy acted so bizarrely.
Click to expand...

Does the reason really matter? You come across like you're trying to justify his actions. Whether or not you are, that's how it comes across. It doesn't matter if the kid was being an ass or not, it's not justification for the 30 year old to steal from anyone, let alone a 16 year old kid.
 
#362
#362
lawgator1 said:
Move the goal posts much?

You guys did the feigned outrage gimmick over it being about the hat. Now you have to shift to it just want justified.

Sad!
Click to expand...

Just to be clear, you, a supposed lawyer, are saying it's okay for a 30 year old man to steal a 16 year old's hat and verbally assault him in public? It speaks for itself, so I'm not sure why anyone has to justify anything.
 
#364
#364
Weezer said:
Just to be clear, you, a supposed lawyer, are saying it's okay for a 30 year old man to steal a 16 year old's hat and verbally assault him in public? It speaks for itself, so I'm not sure why anyone has to justify anything.
Click to expand...

Exactly
He’s not an Fing lawyer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#365
#365
Weezer said:
Just to be clear, you, a supposed lawyer, are saying it's okay for a 30 year old man to steal a 16 year old's hat and verbally assault him in public? It speaks for itself, so I'm not sure why anyone has to justify anything.
Click to expand...

Everyone needs to understand that LG is a democrat first and foremost. Before anything else.

Things will make a lot more sense once you understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#366
#366
“Jimenez said seeing the hat had the same effect on him that a Ku Klux Klan hood would have had.”

From the mouths of babes
 
#367
#367
Weezer said:
Just to be clear, you, a supposed lawyer, are saying it's okay for a 30 year old man to steal a 16 year old's hat and verbally assault him in public? It speaks for itself, so I'm not sure why anyone has to justify anything.
Click to expand...

It isn’t just verbal assault. Throwing the drink on the kid meets the criteria for simple assault in TX and is normally a class C misdemeanor. I looked it up after this happened. Not sure if elevates to felony since he assaulted a minor.
 
#368
#368
lawgator1 said:
Move the goal posts much?

You guys did the feigned outrage gimmick over it being about the hat. Now you have to shift to it just want justified.

Sad!
Click to expand...

I mean, who's really shifting the goal posts here? There's no justification for the man's actions, so I'm not sure why you're trying to find one. Kid could be a complete ass hat, it doesn't give the man the right to do what he did.
 
#369
#369
Weezer said:
Does the reason really matter? You come across like you're trying to justify his actions. Whether or not you are, that's how it comes across. It doesn't matter if the kid was being an ass or not, it's not justification for the 30 year old to steal from anyone, let alone a 16 year old kid.
Click to expand...
If I did come across that way, it wasn't my intent. I don't condone his actions at all. Neither do I condone hate speech, which if true, it fits the bill.
 
#370
#370
TennTom said:
If I did come across that way, it wasn't my intent. I don't condone his actions at all. Neither do I condone hate speech, which if true, it fits the bill.
Click to expand...

"Hate speech"? What the hell does that even mean?
 
#371
#371
TennTom said:
If I did come across that way, it wasn't my intent. I don't condone his actions at all. Neither do I condone hate speech, which if true, it fits the bill.
Click to expand...

Hate speach.....or any speach.....is protected by the constitution. Racist have the right to be racist and say so. That’s not a crime.....unbelievably stupid.....but not a crime. Striking some for exercising their right to speak is a crime.

See the difference?
 
#373
#373
TennTom said:
If I did come across that way, it wasn't my intent. I don't condone his actions at all. Neither do I condone hate speech, which if true, it fits the bill.
Click to expand...

You don’t condone it but this is simply par for the course for the Left. I didn’t vote for president last election, just wrote my name in, but it is crap like this that pushes people to vote for Trump.
 
#374
#374
TennTom said:
If I did come across that way, it wasn't my intent. I don't condone his actions at all. Neither do I condone hate speech, which if true, it fits the bill.
Click to expand...



And you believe everyone that leans right is racist? That really is a bull**** thing to imply. Labeling everyone who disagrees with you as racist, or homophobe, or whatever else, it really serves no purpose, and it certainly isn't true.
 
#375
#375
Orangeslice13 said:
Hate speach.....or any speach.....is protected by the constitution. Racist have the right to be racist and say so. That’s not a crime.....unbelievably stupid.....but not a crime. Striking some for exercising their right to speak is a crime.

See the difference?
Click to expand...
Yes, I know it's constitutional. Still doesn't make it right. The things they were saying are abhorrent. If true, it's sad that kids are raised to think that's acceptable, especially to speak publicly like that. Wouldn't you agree?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top