Of course not, who presented that dichotomy?
I did, maybe you should.
Almost half the countries in the world are governed by authoritarian regimes, according to a new study by the Social Science Research Center (WZB) in Berlin. But how do you define "authoritarian"?
According to the researchers, it's anything that is not a democracy.
You posited that the very act of President Trump and KJU meeting together was "legitimizing" the regime. Therefore, it can be reasonably inferred that you disagree with Trump meeting with KJU.
I don't believe the act of meeting legitimized KJU's dictatorship. FDR had multiple pictures of himself taken while meeting with Stalin, that doesn't mean he was legitimizing the Soviet Union.
However, I partially agree with you in the sense that having the American flag alongside the DPRK flag is undoubtedly a bad look and would be a legitmization. In my mind, this would be equivalent to having the American flag alongside the Nazi flag. Overall, this is not a big deal though compared to the larger picture and what is at stake.
Nevertheless, I am still glad at least a dialogue is open with NK and still laud Trump for going where no President has gone before.
You posted a random link and it mentioned nothing about meeting with foreign leaders.
It's not random. You offered you didn't understand what it meant that kim was legitimized when he was clearly the 'leader'.
I presented you with a simplistic article that explains the what's and why's of authoritarian legitimization including the two other pillars of what keeps a despot in power.
That it didn't talk about "meeting" with a foreign "leader" is probably because any rational person would be able to understand that having a political summit with one would be the epitome of said legitimization. So - if you want to play word games, you're barking up the wrong tree.
If you have any further qualms with what the article included or didn't include, take it up with the author. It was pretty clear.
An opportunity that he never gets a shot at if he does not meet with KJ........you seem to be contradicting yourself here big guy......
The author didnt post the link claiming it supported you. And once again, the legitimacy of his regime is not in question
Authoritarian regimes have not been legitimized by free and fair elections. Their power is based on violence and oppression. So how do they gain support among the people, and how long can that support last?
I don't think you've read it, or you're having a massive amount of difficulty grasping it.
This is the very first sentence in the article:
It doesn't need to, it's implied.Right. Still never mentions meeting with world leaders.
Irrelevant.If anything, the MSM legitimizes him every day.
Maybe not with you it's not.But once again, his legitimacy isnt in question.
By the heel of his boots they do.The NK people accept him.
That any of you would make fun of an occupation says everything about your lack of character.
Funny thing is, I know some fork lift drivers that likely have higher incomes than you are capable of making.
BTW, nice grammar. Another poster boy for the DDOA