#BoycottNRA

#3,801
#3,801
luthervol said:
I've stated MULTIPLE times I support the right to own a gun for self defense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I also don't believe property rights or the right to self defense gives you the right to bury land mines in your yard or carry a machine gun into Neyland Stadium.

THERE ARE REASONABLE AND RATIONAL LIMITS!!
Click to expand...

I have a right to defend myself with a machine gun. I just don’t have a right to wield one on someone else’s property (neyland stadium).
 
#3,803
#3,803
NorthDallas40 said:
That’s big of you Luth. But as a right your opinion isn’t required. Neither is mine. It stands on its own merits.

Your rationalization to give the government administration power over a right thus dillutes it to more like a privilege then. That’s wrong. Many people believe NFA 1934 is over reaching.

So take your reasonable and rational crap elsewhere. There are already too many gun laws. We’re gonna vehemently fight anymore.
Click to expand...

I'm sure you will fight them, but you're going to be in an ever shrinking minority and on the losers side.
 
#3,805
#3,805
Vol8188 said:
I have a right to defend myself with a machine gun. I just don’t have a right to wield one on someone else’s property (neyland stadium).
Click to expand...

How about defending yourself with mustard gas?

How about a public park? Or a state owned university campus? How about a public beach?

Do you have the right to have anti aircraft guns mounted in your front yard? How about some ICBMs?
 
#3,807
#3,807
luthervol said:
How about defending yourself with mustard gas?

How about a public park? Or a state owned university campus? How about a public beach?

Do you have the right to have anti aircraft guns mounted in your front yard? How about some ICBMs?
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
#3,810
#3,810
The government only has to live by the rules of the Constitution, the rest of us dummies has about a 4" thick set of rules to live by.
 
#3,813
#3,813
McDad said:
Agreed. My question, for example, I have fingertips and not toetips but I can tiptoe and not tipfinger.
Click to expand...
You know what I keep wondering. Why does an elevator that only serve 2 floors have 2 buttons? When you get on, you want to go to the other floor, so only one button would seem necessary. I mean it's not like you will push the button of the floor you are on...
 
#3,815
#3,815
luthervol said:
How about defending yourself with mustard gas?

How about a public park? Or a state owned university campus? How about a public beach?

Do you have the right to have anti aircraft guns mounted in your front yard? How about some ICBMs?
Click to expand...

How does one defend themself with mustard gas?

Is your argument right now that mustard gas and icbms are equal to ar 15s?
 
#3,817
#3,817
NorthDallas40 said:
I routinely defend myself with mustard gas after grilling beer brats and washing them down with some Shiner Bocks.
Click to expand...

Current Active Shooter Protocol: Run, Hide, Fight.
Liberal version: Run, Hide, Protest.
Conservative Version: Aim, Slack, Squeeze.
ND40 Version: Point, Press, Poot.

Only the last two give you a reasonable chance of survival.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,818
#3,818
SpaceCoastVol said:
You know what I keep wondering. Why does an elevator that only serve 2 floors have 2 buttons? When you get on, you want to go to the other floor, so only one button would seem necessary. I mean it's not like you will push the button of the floor you are on...
Click to expand...
Why do you even need an elevator for only 2 floors? Take the stairs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,819
#3,819
luthervol said:
I've stated MULTIPLE times I support the right to own a gun for self defense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I also don't believe property rights or the right to self defense gives you the right to bury land mines in your yard or carry a machine gun into Neyland Stadium.

THERE ARE REASONABLE AND RATIONAL LIMITS!!
Click to expand...

Then let's do a little math experiment...

X = the number of AR-15's (and variants) currently owned by civilians;
Y = the number of AR-15's (and variants) used in mass shootings;
Leading us to Z, which is Y divided by X to ascertain the percentage of AR-15's (and variants) used in mass shootings.

Now...when you get to Z, would you say that banning AR-15's (and variants) based on this number is reasonable...or rational?

I already know the answer, I just want to see your explanation for it.
 
#3,821
#3,821
I want to know how luther feels about buying the Garand rifle. He has not said anything about it and after all it is truly a weapon of war. Should they be banned as well I wonder? Maybe if I paint it black.
 
#3,822
#3,822
SpaceCoastVol said:
I want to know how luther feels about buying the Garand rifle. He has not said anything about it and after all it is truly a weapon of war. Should they be banned as well I wonder? Maybe if I paint it black.
Click to expand...

Uhhh...Garand. Pronounced "gARand". Automatically on the list. Assault spelling.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,823
#3,823
Vol8188 said:
How does one defend themself with mustard gas?

Is your argument right now that mustard gas and icbms are equal to ar 15s?
Click to expand...

My argument is what it has always been, people have the right to "arms" in order to defend themselves but there are rational and reasonable limitations.
 
#3,824
#3,824
GreyWolf1129 said:
Then let's do a little math experiment...

X = the number of AR-15's (and variants) currently owned by civilians;
Y = the number of AR-15's (and variants) used in mass shootings;
Leading us to Z, which is Y divided by X to ascertain the percentage of AR-15's (and variants) used in mass shootings.

Now...when you get to Z, would you say that banning AR-15's (and variants) based on this number is reasonable...or rational?

I already know the answer, I just want to see your explanation for it.
Click to expand...
There is much more to gun regulation than the prevention of mass shootings. (that would be just a small variable) Guns used in crimes / murders is the more significant issue.
 
#3,825
#3,825
SpaceCoastVol said:
I want to know how luther feels about buying the Garand rifle. He has not said anything about it and after all it is truly a weapon of war. Should they be banned as well I wonder? Maybe if I paint it black.
Click to expand...

I have no clue nor do I care. Put it to the x / y test and see how it stacks up.

My lack of interest in types of guns may be like your lack of interest in types of rocks, or tennis shoes (pick something in which you have little to no interest.)
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top