SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 55,005
- Likes
- 68,749
What's the big deal? It's a movie I have never heard of. Hardly a 'wtf' moment.
Well you are the one that gave me a 'wtf' dude. Sorry that I don't watch every pop movie that comes down the pike.It's not a big deal, but it's widely quoted, so it's surprise to find someone that's never heard of it.
"Bye Felicia!"
"You got KTFO, man!"
damn! Youve got to be one stupid MFer to get fired on your day off.
Among others.
It's not the market that they're taking advantage of, it's government.
How so?
The USPS was going to be there either way. They can either have the business or not have the business. As the postal worker stated earlier in this thread - they're grateful to have it.
I don't see how Amazon could be 'taking advantage' of the USPS if the USPS went into the deal with eye's wide open and they negotiated and settled on a contracted price based on the volume.
You mean the way that I don't think that trump should be using his governmental influence to manipulate a private company deals? Because that seems pretty libertarian.
HFS, are you really trying to spin this back to the dems as an excuse?
Trump does something (else) incredibly stupid and not at all conservative and you're going to cast blame (via me and 'the dems') for pointing it out? LOL
Rational people irrespective of their party affiliation (but especially conservatives) should be beside themselves for trumps boorish Amazon attacking behavior.
That you appear to be defending him "no matter what" by way of attacking the dems is ironic. You're coming across as doing the very thing which you claim to despise.
Amazon pays the US post office to deliver packages to customers' doors, including on Sundays, and because Amazon ships so many packages though the post office, it's charged at a lower rate than most customers, CNN has reported. But Amazon does not receive a special rate; it pays the rate that the post office charges other bulk shippers.
Neither Amazon nor the post office has disclosed the details of its agreement, but the Postal Service says the deal is mutually beneficial.
It's not really. A libertarian would be against using force or the threat of force to influence a business. If he's just blasting them for practices he doesn't like, it's not on the libertarian scale for evaluation.
A libertarian should definitely be against a USPS that uses force to create winners and losers in the market place.
But that's not what he's doing. His comments alone have cost the company billions and with it gobs of other market share for funds tied to it. Actions have consequences and as president his words carry weight.
As a libertarian it's disgusting to think any governmental employee should be able to influence the private marketplace with impunity.
The USPS isn't using force to do anything, all bulk shippers get the same deal. Volume deals are open to all. Amazon isn't even special in this regard, they're just being singled out.
Get the .gov out of the USPS and I think it would probably do well. They are as hamstrung by the .gov as they are strongarming the competition. The USPS is really in a no win positionYou're essentially saying the president can't talk about business.
The USPS operates by force. They have banned competition on courier service. This and tax dollars subsidize the gap on parcel service. Amazon is the biggest beneficiary of this use of force. You should have a problem with it. It's market distortion. There are winners and losers, regardless if it's available to everyone.
Of the pollsters doing approval ratings, they were the most accurate in the last election.
Also, they poll likely voters. Most other ones do registered voters or everyone.
Anyone who thinks that Trump's attacks on Amazon are about the finances of the postal service or taxes paid by Amazon are absolutely delusional. He is simply viciously (and largely inaccurately) going after someone (Bezos) that he views as a political enemy.
He has and will continue to do this -- uses the tools of government for ill-advised and often false or misleading attacks on personal or political rivals.
You're essentially saying the president can't talk about business.
The USPS operates by force. They have banned competition on courier service. This and tax dollars subsidize the gap on parcel service. Amazon is the biggest beneficiary of this use of force. You should have a problem with it. It's market distortion. There are winners and losers, regardless if it's available to everyone.
No, what I'm saying is that the president shouldn't single out a private business to attack, ever. It becomes even more egregious of an abuse when no laws have been broken. Especially when the intent is to cause harm, which he's done with clear vindiction.
My political lean on the USPS 'right to exist' is a different argument all together (they shouldn't). In this argument and in reality, they do. I can't inception my way down through more than two layers of outrage at a time.
If you think that trump calling this a SCAM is defensible then I'm all ears. The biggest irony is that he's the last guy in the world that should be criticizing ways to "get over" (as he alleges) on the government. He's made a career of it.