#BoycottNRA

#2,702
#2,702
OuterBanksVol said:
So we shouldn't examine or consider policies of other nations? Seems pretty close-minded.

But, yes, we're off the chart in ownership and deaths. I don't believe the concept of widespread gun ownership and reasonable controls are mutually-exclusive concepts.
Click to expand...

You are more than welcome to leave and take LG and Luther under each arm. Guns gave you the right to be a liberal *****. Believe it or not, they help keep that right. Go to those other countries and try their damn freedom for awhile, who knows, you may like it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,705
#2,705
OuterBanksVol said:
My mantra has been consistent and simple:

1. Ban assault style weapons
2. Ban high capacity magazines
3. Ban bump stocks

Yes, you can make the argument, "oh there's this weapon or that weapon which could be used just as deadly as an assault style weapon." Well that just doesn't hold any water since the majority of these recent mass murders are being effectuated by AR15 style weapons.

This weapon has no rightful place for civilian use.
Click to expand...

Those three points are rational and reasonable. I believe all 3 of those will be accomplished in the next year or so.

You will get all of the usual responses, but brighter minds will prevail. It's unfortunate that we couldn't lead and could only react to the voices of youth.

The youth of America are just shaking their heads in disgust and disbelief at what we have allowed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,706
#2,706
luthervol said:
Those three points are rational and reasonable. I believe all 3 of those will be accomplished in the next year or so.

You will get all of the usual responses, but brighter minds will prevail. It's unfortunate that we couldn't lead and could only react to the voices of youth.

The youth of America are just shaking their heads in disgust and disbelief at what we have allowed.
Click to expand...

This the same youth that eats Tide Pods and really doesn't understand how the Constitution works?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,707
#2,707
OuterBanksVol said:
So we shouldn't examine or consider policies of other nations? Seems pretty close-minded.

But, yes, we're off the chart in ownership and deaths. I don't believe the concept of widespread gun ownership and reasonable controls are mutually-exclusive concepts.
Click to expand...

I'm assuming that chart includes suicides?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,708
#2,708
luthervol said:
Those three points are rational and reasonable. I believe all 3 of those will be accomplished in the next year or so.

You will get all of the usual responses, but brighter minds will prevail. It's unfortunate that we couldn't lead and could only react to the voices of youth.

The youth of America are just shaking their heads in disgust and disbelief at what we have allowed.
Click to expand...

We’ll compromise. We’ll keep 1 and 2 and ban 3. Yes?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#2,709
#2,709
Pepe_Silvia said:
Children are the only people more naive than the anti-gun crowd, and that's why the gun grabbers love to manipulate children to advance their agenda.
Click to expand...

Yup.

“The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. As long as the government is perceived as working for the benefit of the children, the people will happily endure almost any curtailment of liberty and almost any deprivation.”
Adolf Hitler
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#2,712
#2,712
Pepe_Silvia said:
These people want to ban something that they can't even define. Might as well ban unicorns.
Click to expand...

I've already defined it. Any gun that will fire more than x rounds per y seconds. We just need to assign some reasonable and rational numbers to x and y.

I'll start. 1000 rounds per second is to much and one round per hour is to few. Now all we have to do is work inward to agreement.
 
#2,713
#2,713
Grand Vol said:
I'd assume it includes deaths by those who aren't legally allowed to own a firearm as it is.

I'd sure love to know what that number would look like when you take illegal firearms out of the mix.
Click to expand...

Yeah, take away that and suicides and I'm thinking the USA would be a little harder to find on that chart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,715
#2,715
luthervol said:
I've already defined it. Any gun that will fire more than x rounds per y seconds. We just need to assign some reasonable and rational numbers to x and y.

I'll start. 1000 rounds per second is to much and one round per hour is to few. Now all we have to do is work inward to agreement.
Click to expand...

So you have absolutely no f’ing idea.

Good talk.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#2,716
#2,716
Cdywolfe said:
Yeah, take away that and suicides and I'm thinking the USA would be a little harder to find on that chart.
Click to expand...

I'd say drop the justified shootings as well and that number drops even more.

Of course, liberals would prefer defenseless women so they can be raped. Those kinda things just add to their "war on women" movement.
 
#2,717
#2,717
luthervol said:
I've already defined it. Any gun that will fire more than x rounds per y seconds. We just need to assign some reasonable and rational numbers to x and y.

I'll start. 1000 rounds per second is to much and one round per hour is to few. Now all we have to do is work inward to agreement.
Click to expand...

Ok let's set the maximum allowable rate of fire at 999 rounds per second.

#compromise

Lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#2,721
#2,721
luthervol said:
Those three points are rational and reasonable. I believe all 3 of those will be accomplished in the next year or so.

You will get all of the usual responses, but brighter minds will prevail. It's unfortunate that we couldn't lead and could only react to the voices of youth.

The youth of America are just shaking their heads in disgust and disbelief at what we have allowed.
Click to expand...

WTF are you talking about? "Allowed" isn't in the 2nd amendment.

The youth are shaking their heads because your side sucks at keeping a family unit and parenting.

Broken homes and "allowing" children to do and say whatever they want are the issue and its your side that has been the proponent in that situation.

How about y'all start taking responsibility for being so damn weak with your kids.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top