SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 56,379
- Likes
- 70,546
First part: You said it. I quoted what you said. You are right, you made no sense.Why would I, who acknowledges that these incidents is rare, want people who are so weak minded that they believe the nutty claims that they did not, to also die? Makes no sense.
I want them the Lord to bless them tonight with some compassion. And a few dozen more IQ points.
Second part: Compassion about what? The dead kids? Pretty sure you won't find anybody on here that doesn't feel compassion for the dead kids and their families.
But what does that accomplish wrt solving the problem? It is more liberal diversion.
Why don't you sit down for a minute and be honest with yourself and decide if you truly in your heart of hearts believe a gun ban of ANY kind will stop the tragedies we see. The gun is the easy target.
The next one might have an AR15. It might have a 9mm Glock. It might be a pipe bomb. It might be a Molotov cocktail at a football game. But the one thing in common they will ALL have is the human being that decided to do the act. That is the problem that you liberals refuse to deal with, because you don't believe there is any inherent evil in men. It's sweet, but naive.
You have no idea how to deal with the mentally unstable or worse the dedicated 'jihadi' for lack of a better description.
I heard one speaker talk about hardening the target. THAT is the solution. Not taking away guns from people. Not melting them down. Not cash for guns. Harden the target. Open schools are a thing of the past. Or this will happen again, and again and again.
They don't have to be prisons either, but that will be the way it starts.
