82_VOL_83
Just wanna be a Brock-Star!
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2012
- Messages
- 49,394
- Likes
- 41,085
So far in the CFP, it seems like the top defenses get torched by the top offenses (spread offenses). Bama got torched by Ohio State in the 2014 CFP for 42, Clemson in the 2015 CFP for 40, and Clemson in the 2016 CFP for 35. They also gave up 42 to OU in the 2014 Sugar Bowl. There's a reason Saban wanted these offenses to be restricted.
Today Georgia, with all of its great front-7 players, can't do a thing to contain OU.
I like the Pruitt hire, I think he's going to do well here in recruiting and coaching, but this is the reason I wanted a spread-oriented coach. That kind of offense gives us the best shot of beating Georgia, Alabama, and even other teams that get their pick of the litter in the front-7 like Florida and LSU. I hope our staff serves notice. I'm fine with being multiple but developing a good QB and spreading the defense out is how you beat the big boys nowadays imo.
Both are needed is correct. Clemson may not be doing well, and CJP is doing a great job, but that doesn't change the fact that offenses who have scored against them have done so by spreading them out and going up tempo. Not by going under center.Georgia beat OU today. And Bama is beating Clemson in the third, 24-6.
Offense is great, but you have to be able to stop your opponent.
Think of it like a war game. You have to be able to do more damage than your opponent (think South in the Civil War), but the better your defense, the longer you are able to stay in the fight (Think Germany in WW2).
Both are needed.
Both are needed is correct. Clemson may not be doing well, and CJP is doing a great job, but that doesn't change the fact that offenses who have scored against them have done so by spreading them out and going up tempo. Not by going under center.
Well, there are other factors as well. While I have no issues with a spread offense, that is a generic term. You can run a spread from under center. You can run an old style, smash mouth two-back run scheme from shotgun.
You have to look at who those teams have faced this year, and what schemes they ran. I can't think of any under center teams that Bama has faced. So, it is most likely talent level more so than scheme. Georgia has faced Georgia Tech, but even they have sets they run from shotgun.
Give me good solid coaches who teach and preach fundamentals. Give me naturally talented athletes who are smart. Give me lots of discipline. Lastly, give me scheme.
Like Neyland said, the team who makes the fewest mistakes wins.
Well, there are other factors as well. While I have no issues with a spread offense, that is a generic term. You can run a spread from under center. You can run an old style, smash mouth two-back run scheme from shotgun.
You have to look at who those teams have faced this year, and what schemes they ran. I can't think of any under center teams that Bama has faced. So, it is most likely talent level more so than scheme. Georgia has faced Georgia Tech, but even they have sets they run from shotgun.
Give me good solid coaches who teach and preach fundamentals. Give me naturally talented athletes who are smart. Give me lots of discipline. Lastly, give me scheme.
Like Neyland said, the team who makes the fewest mistakes wins.
Defense gave up 38 in regulation. Playing well in the second half doesn't mean they won the game. Offense needed 45 in regulation to take it to OT. These games are played in the 30s and 40s. UGA was able to keep up. Pretty simple.
But again, no way a pro-style heavy offense can score as much against UGA (or Bama) as OU did. That's the point that is being lost even though it should be such an easy point to grasp.
Georgia beat OU today. And Bama is beating Clemson in the third, 24-6.
Offense is great, but you have to be able to stop your opponent.
Think of it like a war game. You have to be able to do more damage than your opponent (think South in the Civil War), but the better your defense, the longer you are able to stay in the fight (Think Germany in WW2).
Both are needed.
I watched most of the games and a) QB play without a doubt is the difference maker, b) If you have a crappy OL and you can't block a good defense, you are toast, c) like someone else said, you don't win championships without a good defense, and d) if you are faster, tougher, stronger, and don't give up, you have a solid chance of winning. I hope CJP brings those things back to UT.
Bama, Georgia, UCF, Notre Dame, Ohio State, etc....all had great defenses.
I watched most of the games and a) QB play without a doubt is the difference maker, b) If you have a crappy OL and you can't block a good defense, you are toast, c) like someone else said, you don't win championships without a good defense, and d) if you are faster, tougher, stronger, and don't give up, you have a solid chance of winning. I hope CJP brings those things back to UT.
Bama, Georgia, UCF, Notre Dame, Ohio State, etc....all had great defenses.
There is a reason Chip Kelly went to UCLA, did not want to face those great SEC defenses on a regular basis. Here is the question you should ask, would you rather have a great offense with a below or average defense OR would you rather have a dominant defense with a average offense? Give me that dominant defense. Bama right now is a dominant defense with a average offense.
In SEC defense is a must, not rocket science. Now getting outside playing a high flying offense one off is a different animal, ask Auburn, whom let UCF take the W
I think the bleacher report summed it up this morning..."throttle the opposing offense, avoid major mistakes, control the pace with an effective running game". Kinda like a summary of the maxims. Bama ain't pretty at times, but they dominate you.