You have a lot of assumptions on someones motives who has never concretely explained their motives - and to the degree they have, only happened after their initial premise started looking very likely to fail.
Youre insistent on a gray area existing and dismissing those who say Beaver is nothing but a troll. Youre also saying that my belief that there is equal validity in their stance is logical absurdism? There is literally zero evidence to favor your assumption over those that believe hes taking everyone for a ride. In fact, those that say he is a troll have much more evidence (both by his predictions not happening and general precedence of trolls existing in FAR greater numbers than insiders online).
Whats absurd is taking everything someone says under the guise of anonymity as gospel, watching their soothsaying prove false, allowing them to remedy their predictions to suit a current climate, then reshaping history under your own personal interpretation of said persons words and motives. Just as you seem to think my insistence on extremes is dangerous, so is assuming your own narrative of a third partys intention as being the only reasonable take. Beaver has had ample opportunity to spell this out for people when its blatantly obvious theres no concise, agreed-upon Road-map for this userbase to follow for all of his implications. Youre assuming clarity in a maze of smoke. Many here see smoke and think fire. Theyre just as right as you are.[/QU
Can you say that in regular American?
