vol4eva
Ding!
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2007
- Messages
- 24,195
- Likes
- 18,121
Agreed. I don't believe in calling someone guilty based on a second hand accusation. I also don't think anyone associated with that situation should be a HC. Not only because of the perception of the program, but because it would be hard to recruit. I don't think he should lose his job, but it's not a smart business move to hire a HC who was in the wrong place at the wrong time, even if he's totally innocent, because of the perception.