newyorkvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,943
- Likes
- 5,797
I didn't see where anyone else mentioned this, but when Butch stepped off the plane in Knoxville almost 5 years ago, all he had signed was an MOU. Not one person was on here discussing if it was a legally binding document.
Why do some of you demand to believe in worst case scenarios?
This is just plain wrong. No part of CBJs contract limits the ADs ability to hire another coach. And, nothing prohibits the University from hiring 2, 3, or 4 head coaches if they so desired.
There would be no treble damages ever in this case, since the buyout is a liquidated damages clause - stating the value of a lost contract.
Perhaps, if you asked an attorney about how contracts work you wouldn't devote minutes of your life to spreading completely false information.
You guys are cracking me up, as if grilling the board attorneys is going to have anything at all to do with the actual substance of whatever document Gruden has signed to indicate his acceptance of employment at a particular time.
Believe the folks who think he is coming, or don't. Your belief will affect only one person: you. If you mope around depressed, again that's only on you. Those bringing info and reason for good cheer will continue to enjoy the anticipation of Grude times to come.![]()
This has probably been asked a thousand times, but what is RF?SIAP...HankHill in the RF(somehow connected to the team. Talks of being at practices and on sideline) says there is lots of chatter around the office today of Butch resigning tomorrow. He says that there previously wasnt any chatter of this until today. TIFWIW
SIAP...HankHill in the RF(somehow connected to the team. Talks of being at practices and on sideline) says there is lots of chatter around the office today of Butch resigning tomorrow. He says that there previously wasnt any chatter of this until today. TIFWIW
I'm one of the few in the camp that thinks Gruden would be a mediocre hire. At the NFL level, Gruden was known as a great X's and O's schemer on the offensive side of the ball. His weakness was player development. The problem is that in college football, player development is much more important than in the pros.
The two college coaches that were the most Gruden-like in resume and / or style have also failed. Jim Mora looked like something close to a "home run hire" in UCLA. And indeed, in the first few years, Mora improved results significantly over his predecessor Neuheisel. Neuheisel went 21 - 29 in 4 seasons, finishing 6-7 in his last year. Mora went 9-5, 10-3, and 10-3 in his first three seasons. But the results have collapsed over the past three seasons as he's gone 16-17. I think this showcases a similar theme, that Mora was good at the X's and O'x, but not player development, and results improved initially, but have dropped over the long-term.
The other Gruden-like coach was Bill Callahan at Nebraska. Mind you, I'm not claiming that Callahan was as good as Gruden, but he basically ran the same style of offense and the results were pretty disastrous. He was 27-22 at Nebraska and 5-7 in his last season. His players never seemed to fully understand his complex offense.
To me, I'd see Callahan and Mora as warnings that Gruden probably isn't well suited for the college game. The one benefit of hiring Gruden is that he'd probably get top 5 classes for several years due to his name recognition and personality, but unless he could improve on player development, significantly simplify his offense, and basically hire an all-star cast that could help compensate for his shortcomings, I'm afraid he might not end up being much different from Callahan or Mora. Then again, maybe I'm underestimating Gruden, and he has a good understanding of his weaknesses and who he needs to hire to fix those problems. But as OP, said, I'd much rather target other coaches (Fuente, Frost, Mullen, Venables) before Gruden.
The simple word, If can remedy any problems with a sitting coach and a MOURemy, I'm not here to argue but you're basing your opinion off incomplete information.
We have no idea what has been agreed to my Currie and Jones. Currie may have already fired Butch or told him he would not be retained unless x, x, and x requirements have been met.
They could have already signed another contract or modified the existing one.
Here is what it boils down to.
Look at what happened at Texas with Strong/Herman.
If you think there wasn't a signed MOU in place with Herman before the press conference firing Strong then no one can convince you.
That deal was done way before he was ever fired and any competent agent would protect his client (Herman) to ensure he got was promised before he ever agreed to take the job.
You just need to take a step back and look at this logically.
And I'm not saying there had been a MOU signed, or Butch fired, or anything.
The truth is we don't know.
But saying it's impossible while a coach is still in place isn't true.