Official Jon Gruden Thread XXVI

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm not sure about the legalities of college football coaching, but I know if you drive drunk and say you didn't know it was illegal to a cop, you're going to jail anyways. Ignorance is not an excuse.

Just claim you didn't have intentions to get over the limit. And your moderation of drinking was gross negligence
 
Others with connected friends parrot the same. I hope part of the struggle here is a shift in the big money and power they hold. If enough high level boosters present a united front do you believe they are capable of forcing the spread of power between the group?

If the majority of high level boosters are on board and leaked that Haslam was the problem, it could force his hand. They don't want that publicity with Bill having apirations to go further in politics.
 
Several years ago something happened that fundamentally changed the UT AD. Most didn't even notice or care. It, in my opinion is why we are where we are today. I'm not sure of the exact date but the UT AD was removed from the president and placed a rung down on the ladder to under the chancellor. This move removed the autonomy of the AD. It has slowly eroded the AD and is the primary cause for the dysfunction we have witnessed over the last decade.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
What seems clear to me is that someone, doesn't really matter who, who's job is to put the best interest of the University first is prioritizing personal gain or interest in this issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 11 people
So basically nothing has changed from page 1 of the begining of these threads.......................


I know, I know it will be today, lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Several years ago something happened that fundamentally changed the UT AD. Most didn't even notice or care. It, in my opinion is why we are where we are today. I'm not sure of the exact date but the UT AD was removed from the president and placed a rung down on the ladder to under the chancellor. This move removed the autonomy of the AD. It has slowly eroded the AD and is the primary cause for the dysfunction we have witnessed over the last decade.

We have a winner...

Life was good under Johnson and Dickey.

Then someone dropped the ball.
ie:power shift
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
No argument there.

I just don't want this to be a black eye on the university. Everything in the press involving UT right now is negative. I also care about the safety of the players. At the end of the day, they're kids giving their all to a college football team. I hope if Butch is in any way involved it is handled swiftly. If he's not, then he shouldn't be the one to pay for it, but being the HC he should know everything going on, on the field and on the sideline.
 
Who wants Gruden as coach?
Who gives enormous amounts of money to the university?
Who cares more about the football program than even the fans?
Who wanted Fulmer as AD?[/QUOTE]

So are you saying in order for us to hire Gruden that we must also fire Currie and hire Fulmer as AD?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I can't find specific instructions. Send me your post number and I'll add it.

All you have to do is click the quotation marks in the bottom right corner of the post you want to quote. You can even select one of your own post. Select as many as you want to quote. Then reply to the post. Don't use "quick reply", it won't work.
.
 
The observer is in the press box with good view of field and sidelines, sees an issue, contacts the replay official, reviews the video, if the observer notices something they contact the ref. Ref stops play and pulls the player out for team medical staff to evaluate. Coaching staff has no say so

Exactly. I'm not sure what these people are referring to when they're suggested Butch played him knowingly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
i tend to agree this in theory.
if the booster coalition doesn't get gruden, and they indeed pull their support, where's the money going to come from to do all this renovation? Haslam? $300+ million from one guy? He indeed may have it, but that's asking A LOT.

Locking the BOT in to that large contract is also a good way to leverage the NEED for those booster dollars.

Pareto, K-H, yada yada, Im here to help the layman...

Essentially: "well guys we got all these expenditures coming, we really need to consider the increased revenue and donations that weve been offered if we bring in Gruden"

But only after theyve signed off on the reno.

Interstingly enough is also this, the reno revision is expected to save 10mil....

Where have we seen that number?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
Who wants Gruden as coach?
Who gives enormous amounts of money to the university?
Who cares more about the football program than even the fans?
Who wanted Fulmer as AD?[/QUOTE]

So are you saying in order for us to hire Gruden that we must also fire Currie and hire Fulmer as AD?


Absolutely not.
I was merely trying to answer your question.
Sorry,
You missed my point altogether.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
i tend to agree this in theory.
if the booster coalition doesn't get gruden, and they indeed pull their support, where's the money going to come from to do all this renovation? Haslam? $300+ million from one guy? He indeed may have it, but that's asking A LOT.

Just going to depend on if what Beaver says is true and Boosters refuse to donate or if they crack under pressure
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top