FacelessArya
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2017
- Messages
- 1,243
- Likes
- 2,346
So the hold up....if you're Currie you have to sleep on it, waiting on timing, or do you still have to convince someone? There is the question
I sometimes wonder why we want Gruden so bad. He did win a Super Bowl and that is about it. Other than that season and one more he was below .500 as an NFL coach and ended his career 100 and 85 with a playoff record of 5 and 4. Other than his NFL career he was a position coach in college has never been the head man. So he is the guy that most want to be the coach here, but I don't see a lot of good coaching years. He was 4 and 12 one season and 5 and 11 another. Of course he has that Super Bowl.
Yeah, this is relatively unprecedented. It wouldn't surprise me if a few high level NCAA attorney's have been drafting policy statements for this exact reason. Answering some version of the question, "When can a prospective NCAA coach announce his employment when he is currently working for a major sports media outlet?"
It's uncharted waters, and I'm fascinated.
In this era, information and opinion moves fast. Once it drops, it'll change overnight - no matter how long we wait. In six months, it won't matter whether he was announced tomorrow, or Nov. 30.
I do have a suspicion, based on a mostly overlooked ATL post, that there are boosters and UT staff working behind the scenes to try and judge how many recruits we lose by waiting. There's a game theory analysis and CBA that is done. If the risk is less than the gain of time behind the scenes you delay as long as possible.
Controlling the spread of information can absolutely not be undervalued.
Well, I don't think it's Currie's choice. My impression is that the deal is so expansive it affects all parts of the University. At which point the decision maker is no longer one person, its the entity known as "The University of Tennessee." This would implicate the Chancellor, BOT, etc.
Some sort of consensus decision would have to be reached and Currie would have to advocate for his plan in the UT Bureaucracy. I just don't believe its as easy as Currie signing on the line. He likely doesn't have authority to cause performance of all the points of the deal.
However, the same game theory approach applies to all who have a say in the decision. It should be a win-win, if they can "not confuse a want and a need."
