I'll also add that he's smart, that he's a constitutional scholar, that he clearly understands technology and its impact on society, that he is youthful and energetic, that he's got an ability to organize and motivate people, that his support comes mostly from small, individual donations (which tells me that a lot of people are motivated by him), that he is willing to meet with people on all sides (not just those who want to tell him what he wants to hear), that he's got "presence," that he doesn't seem to get too flustered by anything that comes his way, that he's great in front of a camera, and that he's active enough to play pickup basketball with a Final Four team.
He's smart, which has value, but I think his ego keeps him from surrounding himself with people smarter than himself, which is a big problem IMO.
He's an attorney, just like John Edwards. Guess they're both constitutional scholars?
He uses the internet to raise money so he gets technology - that's good stuff. While the linkage there is shoddy at best, I like your creativity. I assume you think his archaic notion of non-personally managed retirement funds works here too? Maybe the age old tax the rich and gift the poor that makes him sound hip to you?
He's youthful and energetic and nobody cares. That can do nothing but hurt him in the international arena. Youthful and woefully inexperienced means less than nothing on that front.
He can organize and motivate sycophants, but putting together a campaign is hardly new ground and having much of the dem and press machine behind him helped dramatically. I don't think you can make this inference from what you've seen, but I know you're try hard at it.
I don't know the breakdown of his support dollars, but I don't buy that it comes from the dollar donation type on the internet. Moreover, a give away money liberal slick talker is exactly who the college crowd is after. Do we really want a president who best sways our early 20 somethings? Is that a measure of a statesman?
His willingness to meet people on all sides is 1) only in theory and yet to be seen in practice 2) wildly misguided in terms of international relations and 3) a ridiculous virtue when the opponent has spent his political career offending those in his own party because he's willing to listen to ideas rather than ideology.
His "presence" is a figment of the press' imagination and has only been proven in the confines of his lackeys. If his presence were overwhelming, he wouldn't be in a dead heat with a boring R on the heels of two disastrous R terms.
The last 3 points, who cares. We're looking for a president, not a movie star or ballplayer.