Recruiting Forum Football Talk XXXVI

Status
Not open for further replies.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSR4RarpGYA[/youtube]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KVsGVJvr0_w[/youtube]
 
Moneyline- straight up pick the winner

Last week I had Georgia on the ML and it paid +190 for every 100 bet.


Tenn will get about that much this week. Have to bet close to 200 to win 100 on florida

I bet $50 on the ML on UGA and won $95.

I'm betting $145 on the ML for Tennessee this week. :)

Also, I don't see how any of these Florida players are gonna play Saturday.
 
Folks better be holding them accountable for information/facts as to how this gets wrapped up and players are cleared to play.. this is a criminal investigation ... so you can commit fraud on the University you attend and receive benefits from and it all is forgiven in roughly 3 weeks? SMDH....

Some of the players suspended didn't report their cards stolen so they'll be cleared sooner than those who decided to double dip.


Scarlett seemed confident on IG that he'll play vs Vols.
 
Some of the players suspended didn't report their cards stolen so they'll be cleared sooner than those who decided to double dip.


Scarlett seemed confident on IG that he'll play vs Vols.

I thought Scarlett was one of those that double dipped?
 
Those cards are for essentials for the athletes. Buying stuff and then selling it is akin to getting impermissible benefits.

I didn't realize the cost of attendence money had to be spent on specific stuff.

Thanks


Every program in country would have guys in trouble for misuse of funds then IMO.
 
Moneyline- straight up pick the winner

Last week I had Georgia on the ML and it paid +190 for every 100 bet.


Tenn will get about that much this week. Have to bet close to 200 to win 100 on florida

If not betting TN why even risk double $ in a close game. Doesn't make sense to me. Plenty of other games to focus on in that case. florida is not worth that risk
 
Just one man's understanding but it didn't seem to me to be an eligibility issue. No payments from boosters or anything like that. They received legal (by NCAA terms) money (on a debit card not eligible for Atm withdrawal) from the school, spent that money on electronics from the school bookstore where those debit cards can be used, then resold the electronics for cash. Nothing about that got them in trouble. They then reported their cards as stolen and that those purchases were not made by the cardholder and got new cards/refunds.

In these cases normally doesn't the NCAA accept a game suspension and to pay back the amount that was stolen?

He didn't really explain but I sort of got the idea he was saying that it hasn't been determined what moneys over and above the permissible amount were involved and which players benefitted so it might be hard to determine what needed to be paid back and by whom. If they played them and it was later determined that one or more players had received and paid back the funds then they could be deem not eligible and those games would have to be forfeited. I think what he was getting to was that they were going to be 100% in the clear before they were allowed to play so it couldn't bite them in the future. He mentioned another team where this happened and they had to forfeit several games. I think it was Alabama.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top