InVOLuntary
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2012
- Messages
- 62,676
- Likes
- 151,949
This conversation is about hate groups. This thread is about hate groups. Why wouldn't I focus on that? Why would I focus on whatever questions your ADD mind wanders to?
You're trying to deflect. The conversation is about black hate groups, not liberals.
This conversation is about hate groups. This thread is about hate groups. Why wouldn't I focus on that? Why would I focus on whatever questions your ADD mind wanders to?
This argument is becoming stupid. Anyone who kills/injures others and/or promulgates hate because of a person's race, is a bigot. Unless you are one of them, why are we trying to defend one side or the other or debating which one is worse than the other based on body counts? Both sides are wrong, one is not worse than the other, they both equally suck.
Yes, keep on pretending the history is something other than what it is. I am not accusing Trump of anything, but the protesters were clearly among his more ardent supporters.
A couple posts up you qualified this by using the term "racial" hate groups. Seems limiting to consider only hate groups who have a racial focus. Plenty of hate dimensions that are equivalent (religion, environmentalism, income/wealth, political, etc.)
Personally I think it's relevant to at least broaden the conversation to extremist groups who advocate and/or use violence to promote their agenda.
If that's the case you can talk about how this was a peaceful protest until the lefties showed up. Ferguson and Baltimore (both of which you brought up) were not peaceful and got violent while unprovoked. Would there have been deaths if white nationals showed up against the rioting blm's? Oh yeah.
You should try focusing on what's important though.
It's the same organization. Their history isn't whitewashed because they stopped getting away with violence.
You're honestly going to say that Antifa is just as bad as the KKK?
