Coach Butch Jones Appreciation thread

JP, a decent AD and board could have gotten someone else with either a better offer control wise or just more money.
They keep telling you everyone else said no but they are not saying why. And that's greatly important to your point.

No, it didn't HAVE to be Dooley.
It just would have taken a little more patience and a lot more intelligence on their part.

It was said they rushed to "save" the recruiting class. Because apparently 1 class was more important than the disaster that followed. Take a little time, make a better offer, make a better hire. It never had to be.
 
Thanks, Charger, I appreciate that, and you're absolutely right.

But I _thought_ we were putting this to bed because "violent agreement at the macro level."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Arguing 3-on-1 is hella fun, but it's not worth the lack of clarity we're gaining from all the effort.

I have got to figure out how to highlight in bold on my phone.

If the core of this argument is about Kiffen or Dooley being more responsible for the mess Jones inherited, I agree with you. But I'm not really sure that's the whole argument because I didn't read everything (lack of interest at the moment).

Probably wasted your time reading this , but just wanted you to know I agree with you at least on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
But I _thought_ we were putting this to bed because "violent agreement at the macro level."

Sorry, like Behr, didn't quite get that far.
Just saw it was being framed imo, as there was no other option and I know that isn't true.

And I saw your point about someone else following kiffin could have saved things. Hell, Jones followed Dooley and Kiffin and did a hell of a lot better job. Dooley didn't make the job more desirable, yet a better hire (by a better AD) had better results. That's just facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
No, I just disagreed with something I saw that was wrong. That I'm still convinced was wrong. Not this side alley about how many coaches were called in a 3 day period, but the basic premise about who's more to blame.

But I thought we were letting this rest. Are we not?
As did I and was then told that wasn't part of the discussion for some reason.

Like this thread is still appreciating Jones while talking about who the bigger a$$hat was between Dooley and Kiffin.
 
The bottom line - if I follow the latest conversation - is that many were asked before Dooley was hired and they said no. Similar situation when Dooley left - first couple of choices said no.

And folks on here believe that firing the current coach will result with securing that high profile coach that is magically going to take Tennessee to heights it has never been at.

History can teach us all things if we care to look at it objectively.
 
As did I and was then told that wasn't part of the discussion for some reason.

Like this thread is still appreciating Jones while talking about who the bigger a$$hat was between Dooley and Kiffin.

They both did damage to the program in different ways.
 
Ok, 05 and Beecher, you're both just wrong. I can only think of one other way to try to explain it to you. A thought experiment.

We're going to take Nick Saban, and have him succeed either Kiffin or Dooley, and see how long it takes him to set the boat right.

CASE ONE: Saban Follows Kiffin
-- '08, Fulmer is fired. Kiffin comes in.
-- '09, Kiffin trolls Urban Meyer, turns out Kiffin was the idiot ... Kiffin tries to turn recruit hostesses into "hostesses," ends up the punch line in a book about corruption in sport ... Kiffin goes 7-6 (4-4 SEC), losing to Va Tech in the Chick-Fil-a Bowl. Kiffin leaves town for the USCw siren song. SABAN IS HIRED.
-- '10, Saban shuts down the "hostess" thing, shuts up all his assistant coaches, and gets down to football. With a fairly decent roster, he goes _____ (what do you think? 8-4? 9-3? 10-2?) in his first year, and then gets hot on recruiting and is competing for championships the very next year ... Tennessee football is right back in the mix, as if the Kiffin year never happened.

...and compare that to...

CASE TWO: Saban Follows Dooley
-- '08, Fulmer is fired. Kiffin comes in.
-- '09, Kiffin trolls Urban Meyer, turns out Kiffin was the idiot ... Kiffin tries to turn recruit hostesses into "hostesses," ends up the punch line in a book about corruption in sport ... Kiffin goes 7-6 (4-4 SEC), losing to Va Tech in the Chick-Fil-a Bowl. Kiffin leaves town for the USCw siren song. Dooley arrives.
-- '10, Dooley insults our own players, gets a taste for it ... gets kinda imperious ... goes 6-7 (3-5 SEC), losing to UNC in the Music City Bowl.
-- '11, Dooley turns making fun of our own players into a habit, seems really proud of himself for trashing them ... Dooley tramples relationships with a number of key high school coaches in the state, and with some key boosters ... also begins making it harder for former Vols players and coaches to come back into the program ... players start to show resentment, in off-field antics, including some stop going to class, and on the field where it is rumored the QB and friends intentionally threw the final game because they couldn't stand the idea of going to a bowl with this coach ... team goes 5-7 (1-7 SEC). The wheels are coming off.
-- '12, Dooley begins his piece de resistance season, utterly alienating everyone associated with the program who wasn't already pissed at him ... some high school coaches are quoted as swearing they will never recommend another of their players go to Tennessee ... meanwhile, Dooley's own team is in open revolt ... practically all the talent on the roster has left or will shortly ... the team goes 5-7 (1-7 SEC) again. Finally, it's enough; Dooley is fired, and SABAN COMES ABOARD.
-- '13 -- Now, I don't care how good you think Saban is, he's not going 8-4, 9-3, or 10-2 with the roster at this point. And he's going to have to spend a year doing the same kinds of things Butch Jones in fact did, repairing relationships, reestablishing links, and so on, before he can start refilling the roster with talent. Fact is, the recovery curve might have been a little steeper with Saban, because we all acknowledge he's a better sideline coach than Butch, but he still couldn't get there without having to fix everything Dooley broke. So it would still be 2-3 years before he was able to compete for championships.

The point? Kiffin's one year was a blip. A blip that could easily have been overcome with a decent AD and a good coaching hire. Dooley's three years, in contrast, were a full-out scouring of the program.

It wasn't Kiffin that drove us into the ground for the better part of a decade. That was largely on Dooley.



You're delusional if you think Saban wouldn't do markedly better than Butch, following Dooley. That's incredible. You're in Butch-love midseason form, buddy!

Bravo!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
The bottom line - if I follow the latest conversation - is that many were asked before Dooley was hired and they said no. Similar situation when Dooley left - first couple of choices said no.

And folks on here believe that firing the current coach will result with securing that high profile coach that is magically going to take Tennessee to heights it has never been at.

History can teach us all things if we care to look at it objectively.

Farh! the coach in the appreciation thread that's not even about him anymore.

At least we got to the bottom line.
 
I'll just say that in regards to the overall context of our conversation, I do agree that it was way of in the weeds. And mostly very pointless.

As for my participation in it, I was strictly dealing with what did happen vs what could have happened, should have happened etc...

And what did happen is a compete mismanagement of the whole situation after we canned Fulmer.

And that falls on Hamilton's, and the other power brokers, shoulders.

In my experience when I look at a given bad situation or result, I typically go back and start looking for "what could have prevented this?"

That's where some of y'all's discussion was, and in that discussion there are all kinds of possibilities available. Don't for Fulmer. Have a better buy out for kiffin. Kiffin not leavin g... Or as charger suggested, better over decision making and patience. Kippy being named interim.. The list could go on...

I'll acknowledge that any/all of that is plausible.

Its just not what did happen, nor was it viewed as anything short of a complete debacle.... By other coaching candidates, media, and fans.

I probably should have just stayed out of it.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top