Volsfaninva917
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2009
- Messages
- 21,217
- Likes
- 33,550
Agree with this being the dream scenario QB wise. Would be huge for recruiting too if we had starters drafted in back to back years.Best case scenario is QD starts the entire year, goes 10 and 2 or better and declares for the draft. JG takes over in 18 and does the same or better, setting UT up as QBU and the top QB recruits all come to UT for the next decade or more.
Worst case scenario is neither QB sets themselves apart. Butch starts the wrong guy, doesn't make a change until it's the worst possible time to do so, damaging the psyche of both QB's in the process and neither one recovers until they transfer to Rutgers and the other UT respectively.
I'm hoping QD starts, wins, goes pro and JG stays to do the same in 18.
Considering we have a very good and experienced line, it is not as critical to have the scrambling, running qb as with Dobbs. I think Dormady will end up with the job and will stay the starter until he doesn't deliver. If JG will stay with the team, he may end up starting later in the season, just not the first few games imo.
But the question was if both were even, not who was the better QB
While many think Dormady's rushing prowess has been underestimated, the majority of the fanbase and media seem to think JG's skill set is the better fit for our scheme. If they remain even though fall camp it's widely thought that Butch will go with the veteran, as he has in the past. Not here to relive Butch starting Worley over Dobbs, but does anyone think there is a realistic chance that the younger, more mobile guy gets the nod over the veteran with a more accurate arm? Dormady has only been in our system for 1 year more than Guarantano has, so it's not like this is a true freshman vs a senior (although QD does have some game experience in mop up duty).
Alabama did this last year playing Jalen Hurts over Barnett, Bateman and Cornwell; all three of which were considered better passers than Hurts. Despite this, Saban went with the raw talent and Hurts led them to an SEC Championship and within 4 points of a National Title, with Hurts earning National Freshman of the year as a result.
Two years ago UCLA went with freshman Josh Rosen over a 5th year senior who had played well towards the end of the prior year in Jerry Nueheusel. Rosen went on to win PAC 12 Freshman of the Year, 1st team Freshman All American and is projected as a top 3 prospect in the 2018 draft.
JT Barrett accounted for 45 touchdowns as a freshman despite an injury cutting his season short during a National Title run at OSU.
Johnny Manziel was a RS Freshman when he had one of the best seasons in college football history and won the Heisman trophy.
Even Deondre Francois and Jacob Eason got the nod as Freshman and played well for the most part.
My point is that although the consensus seems to be that Jones won't put his future in the hands of a Freshman QB, there has been enough evidence in the past 5 years to prove that Freshman QB's can be difference makers. If you're always going to play the guy who's been around the longest, what's the point of even bringing in an elite guy every season?
If Dormady wins the job outright then he should be the starter, and the same goes for Jarrett if he wins the job outright. But if they remain even why not give the guy who fits the scheme a little bit better a shot?
How do you determine the best player that determines the best chances to win on the field? How about the field?
First of all,I am not advising a two qb system. Consider recent history. After Worley as out for the season, you have a choice between a qb that's really good in practice but with the propensity to melt down in games. Then you have the qb that lags in practice but electrifies in games. A coach can not know these things without the game. Why would you take that chance? Then there is Sheaffer/Ainge, Stewart/Manning. Can any one consider these qb competitions as anything other than a success? And if these players are real competitors, this is exactly what they live for. Another observation is that you could not create a greater competition between the two. Could you imagine a really bad practice being as devastating as a bad game if they are fighting for their qb future. Its great to have two guys we believe in than to have just one prima donna in waiting.
What it comes down to is letting the competition run its coarse and letting the winner actually win it as opposed to awarding it, just so you can say you have your #1. Not a two qb system, just letting #1 be determined when he wins it.
I think JG would transfer if he doesn't start unfortunately. Why would he want to stay behind QD for another two years and only get a chance at starting for 2 years?
While many think Dormady's rushing prowess has been underestimated, the majority of the fanbase and media seem to think JG's skill set is the better fit for our scheme. If they remain even though fall camp it's widely thought that Butch will go with the veteran, as he has in the past. Not here to relive Butch starting Worley over Dobbs, but does anyone think there is a realistic chance that the younger, more mobile guy gets the nod over the veteran with a more accurate arm? Dormady has only been in our system for 1 year more than Guarantano has, so it's not like this is a true freshman vs a senior (although QD does have some game experience in mop up duty).
^ Unfortunately this is college football now, very rare for a kid to ride the pine if they truly are as good as advertised. you don't have to play in the SEC to get on national tv and get highly drafted, hes a northeast boy at heart and if he and his family see the writing on the wall and he can transfer and start at a Rutgers and light it up. He will leave for sure.
If all things are even, Jones will start Dormandy over Guarantano. If that's the situation, either are qualified to do the job. Fulmer started Todd Helton over Manning. Turned out Manning had the "it" factor, took over mid-season, and the rest is history.
On paper JG appears to the next big thing but, Dormandy has not shown any weaknesses or reasons to lose his spot. He's more mobile than people thought, big arm, knows the offense, prototypical QB build, etc.. How could any coach not give him his due? What if he's actually better than JG? (Gasp). Nobody knows until the games are played.
While many think Dormady's rushing prowess has been underestimated, the majority of the fanbase and media seem to think JG's skill set is the better fit for our scheme. If they remain even though fall camp it's widely thought that Butch will go with the veteran, as he has in the past. Not here to relive Butch starting Worley over Dobbs, but does anyone think there is a realistic chance that the younger, more mobile guy gets the nod over the veteran with a more accurate arm? Dormady has only been in our system for 1 year more than Guarantano has, so it's not like this is a true freshman vs a senior (although QD does have some game experience in mop up duty).
Alabama did this last year playing Jalen Hurts over Barnett, Bateman and Cornwell; all three of which were considered better passers than Hurts. Despite this, Saban went with the raw talent and Hurts led them to an SEC Championship and within 4 points of a National Title, with Hurts earning National Freshman of the year as a result.
Two years ago UCLA went with freshman Josh Rosen over a 5th year senior who had played well towards the end of the prior year in Jerry Nueheusel. Rosen went on to win PAC 12 Freshman of the Year, 1st team Freshman All American and is projected as a top 3 prospect in the 2018 draft.
JT Barrett accounted for 45 touchdowns as a freshman despite an injury cutting his season short during a National Title run at OSU.
Johnny Manziel was a RS Freshman when he had one of the best seasons in college football history and won the Heisman trophy.
Even Deondre Francois and Jacob Eason got the nod as Freshman and played well for the most part.
My point is that although the consensus seems to be that Jones won't put his future in the hands of a Freshman QB, there has been enough evidence in the past 5 years to prove that Freshman QB's can be difference makers. If you're always going to play the guy who's been around the longest, what's the point of even bringing in an elite guy every season?
If Dormady wins the job outright then he should be the starter, and the same goes for Jarrett if he wins the job outright. But if they remain even why not give the guy who fits the scheme a little bit better a shot?
No N in Dormady....
I do believe JG will transfer out instead of waiting another year. Being the top rated QB coming in, I'm sure he's biting his nails to play. And there are a lot of teams that would take him in a heartbeat to run their offense. jmo
I do not have any confidence in Butch's ability to make the right QB decision. I like Butch but this is purely based on how bad he messed it up last time. He picked Worley over Dobbs and Peterman that second year. Peterman wasn't SEC ready but he put Peterman in first before Dobbs in that Alabama game. Dobbs had multiple starts under his belt when he was passed by Peterman whose only start was a disaster. Before all this, Riley Furgeson had already transferred as he was upset over being overlooked in favor of Worley. That second year, had Dobbs played on Florida, we would have won. FL made a change in QB with offense not clicking and won 10-9. We stuck with what wasn't working and lost with only 9 points on board.
Butch got lucky that Dobbs didn't leave his second year after being 3rd string behind Worley and Peterman. He only got chance in AL game after Peterman.
Yep, I have no confidence Butch will pick the right QB.
No N in Dormady....
I do believe JG will transfer out instead of waiting another year. Being the top rated QB coming in, I'm sure he's biting his nails to play. And there are a lot of teams that would take him in a heartbeat to run their offense. jmo