If he wins 9 every year and gets fired, I can't see any other coach (.. who is smart ...) wanting to be anywhere near Tennessee.
If he wins 9 every year and gets fired, I can't see any other coach (.. who is smart ...) wanting to be anywhere near Tennessee.
^^^^ That's truth right there! ^^^^
LSwho fired miles and Ed the Ogre was the best they could get, LMAO!!!
Most people can't even understand what he says.
Just more ignorance from the
Extremely
Stupid
People
Network
VFL...GBO!!!
If he wins 9 every year, he's here till he's 65.
If he wins 9 every year and gets fired, I can't see any other coach (.. who is smart ...) wanting to be anywhere near Tennessee.
8-4 regular season, with 4-4 in conference play, and a rotating birth in the Liberty/Belk/Music City bowls every year.
You really think that never winning the division and making it to the SECCG should keep CBJ employed at UT?
Is your name by chance, Mike Hamilton?![]()
Here is where I get confused. I'm Not criticizing anyone here, just trying to understand.
Wise makes his statement that if Butch wins 9 every year, he's here til he's 65.
102455 makes his statement that if he's fired after winning 9 every year, no "smart" coach would want to be here.
BV seems to think 102455 thinks Butch should keep his job if he wins 9 and not making the SECCG.
My question is, does Wise and 102455 actually think Butch "should" keep his job if he wins 9 but doesn't win the East?
I ask because, I agree with both Wise and 102455. I've made similar statements. But, just because I think that, doest mean that's what I think should happen, or want to happen.
Maybe I'm wrong, Wise and 102455 May think he should keep his job by winning 9 whether he wins the East or not, but that's why I'm asking.
Hence the '?'...
On a side note, do you honestly believe that Blackburn/Fulmer, and future ADs, would really retain CBJ for the next 16 years if he maintains 4-4 in conference play every year?
Here is where I get confused. I'm Not criticizing anyone here, just trying to understand.
Wise makes his statement that if Butch wins 9 every year, he's here til he's 65.
102455 makes his statement that if he's fired after winning 9 every year, no "smart" coach would want to be here.
BV seems to think 102455 thinks Butch should keep his job if he wins 9 and not making the SECCG.
My question is, does Wise and 102455 actually think Butch "should" keep his job if he wins 9 but doesn't win the East?
I ask because, I agree with both Wise and 102455. I've made similar statements. But, just because I think that, doest mean that's what I think should happen, or want to happen.
Maybe I'm wrong, Wise and 102455 May think he should keep his job by winning 9 whether he wins the East or not, but that's why I'm asking.
Here's a couple of Bible verses Hugh Freeze must have skipped over
Proverbs 12:19
Truthful words stand the test of time, but lies are soon exposed.
2 Timothy 2:5
An athlete is not crowned unless he competes according to the rules[/QUOTE]
Timothy never met Cam Newton
Goes to show how flawed humanity is and has been since original sin doesn't it when people are rewarded for doing what is unjust? There's life under the sun (Ecclesiastes) and life under the Son (salvation in Christ).
Here is where I get confused. I'm Not criticizing anyone here, just trying to understand.
Wise makes his statement that if Butch wins 9 every year, he's here til he's 65.
102455 makes his statement that if he's fired after winning 9 every year, no "smart" coach would want to be here.
BV seems to think 102455 thinks Butch should keep his job if he wins 9 and not making the SECCG.
My question is, does Wise and 102455 actually think Butch "should" keep his job if he wins 9 but doesn't win the East?
I ask because, I agree with both Wise and 102455. I've made similar statements. But, just because I think that, doest mean that's what I think should happen, or want to happen.
Maybe I'm wrong, Wise and 102455 May think he should keep his job by winning 9 whether he wins the East or not, but that's why I'm asking.
Hence the '?'...
On a side note, do you honestly believe that Blackburn/Fulmer, and future ADs, would really retain CBJ for the next 16 years if he maintains 4-4 in conference play every year?
I know you weren't asking me, so let me answer
I agree that 9 wins next season probably buys him 2018 just because of losing key pieces.
But if 9 wins (especially if that includes a mid level bowl), is his ceiling, I don't believe he would be retained indefinitely, nor should he.
I saw the question mark. I also saw the Mike Hamilton comment. I said you "seemed" to think that's what he meant. I'm not going to argue what everyone meant and thinks what others think. If I was wrong I apologize. Done.
I have no idea what a new AD will do. No, I don't actually think he's safe for the next 16 years if he doesn't win at least the East, but I don't know. You don't either. You keep bringing up the conference record. The new AD, which I don't even have a good feeling on who it will be, may not be as concerned about conference wins as you or me are, as long as we're winning 8-9 regular season and a bowl.